After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 523441 - oowriter/bug_361624.py regression tests #1 through #4 produce the wrong results.
oowriter/bug_361624.py regression tests #1 through #4 produce the wrong results.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: orca
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: 2.24.0
Assigned To: Orca Maintainers
Orca Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks: 523438
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-19 21:06 UTC by Rich Burridge
Modified: 2008-04-04 18:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Revision #1. (3.33 KB, patch)
2008-03-26 21:06 UTC, Rich Burridge
committed Details | Review

Description Rich Burridge 2008-03-19 21:06:44 UTC
Test 1 of 4 FAILED: /home/richb/gnome/orca/trunk/test/keystrokes/oowriter/bug_361624.py:Read first line in flat review mode
EXPECTED:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  'panel EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  October   $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  'EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  Octobe', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: 'panel EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  October  ",
     "'",
ACTUAL:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  'panel EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  October  Intercept Personal  $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  'EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  Octobe', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: 'panel EFFector Vol. 19, No. 38  October  Intercept Personal ",
     "'",


Test 2 of 4 FAILED: /home/richb/gnome/orca/trunk/test/keystrokes/oowriter/bug_361624.py:Read line two in flat review mode
EXPECTED:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  '10, 2006  editor@eff.org * EFF Sues for Information on  $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  '10, 2006  editor@eff.org * EFF S', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: '10, 2006  editor@eff.org",
     " * EFF Sues for Information on '",
ACTUAL:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  '10, 2006  editor@eff.org Communications $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  '10, 2006  editor@eff.org Communi', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: '10, 2006  editor@eff.org",
     " Communications",
     "'",


Test 3 of 4 FAILED: /home/richb/gnome/orca/trunk/test/keystrokes/oowriter/bug_361624.py:Read line three in flat review mode
EXPECTED:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  ' Electronic Surveillance  $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  ' Electronic Surveillance  $l', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: '",
     " Electronic Surveillance ",
     "'",
ACTUAL:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  '  $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  '  $l', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: 'white space'",


Test 4 of 4 FAILED: /home/richb/gnome/orca/trunk/test/keystrokes/oowriter/bug_361624.py:Read line four in flat review mode
EXPECTED:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  'A Publication of the Electronic  Systems $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  'A Publication of the Electronic ', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: 'A Publication of the Electronic  Systems",
     "'",
ACTUAL:
     "BRAILLE LINE:  'A Publication of the Electronic  Washington, D.C. - The FLAG  $l'",
     "     VISIBLE:  'A Publication of the Electronic ', cursor=1",
     "SPEECH OUTPUT: 'A Publication of the Electronic  Washington, D.C. - The FLAG '",
Comment 1 Rich Burridge 2008-03-26 20:39:42 UTC
This regression test is going a flat review of some of the lines
in .../orca/test/keystrokes/oowriter/column-example.odt

This document comes in two columns. The previous (EXPECTED) results
just gave a flat review of the items in the first column. Now the
(ACTUAL) results are giving us a flat review of all the items on each
line but spanning two columns.

I'd say what we are getting now is more correct. Will, do you agree?
If so, I'll adjust the regression test results to match.
Comment 2 Willie Walker 2008-03-26 20:43:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This regression test is going a flat review of some of the lines
> in .../orca/test/keystrokes/oowriter/column-example.odt
> 
> This document comes in two columns. The previous (EXPECTED) results
> just gave a flat review of the items in the first column. Now the
> (ACTUAL) results are giving us a flat review of all the items on each
> line but spanning two columns.
> 
> I'd say what we are getting now is more correct. Will, do you agree?
> If so, I'll adjust the regression test results to match.

Yep, it is more correct for our current flat review implementation.
Comment 3 Rich Burridge 2008-03-26 21:06:28 UTC
Created attachment 108088 [details] [review]
Revision #1.

Patch committed to SVN trunk. Moving to '[pending]'.
Comment 4 Rich Burridge 2008-04-04 18:32:08 UTC
Thanks Mike. Closing as FIXED.