After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 47927 - symbolic links on FTP and SFTP broken
symbolic links on FTP and SFTP broken
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
2.8.x
Other Linux
: High normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 92615 135461 144057 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-03-29 21:29 UTC by Ben Liblit
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description Ben Liblit 2001-09-10 01:19:50 UTC
Use Nautilus to view <ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/>.  Notice the large number of
broken symbolic links.  However, these links are not broken; they link to
subdirectories that exist and they work perfectly well in any other FTP client I
have tried.



------- Additional Comments From darin@bentspoon.com 2001-03-30 12:11:28 ----

Sounds like bug 43925. I wonder why this started happening again?



------- Additional Comments From sullivan@eazel.com 2001-04-27 12:56:28 ----

Hmm, I can't reproduce this. ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/ shows a large number of
normal-looking, non-broken symbolic links.

We used to have a bug like this (bug 43925) that was fixed a while back. Is it
possible that the reporter is using an old Nautilus?



------- Additional Comments From sullivan@eazel.com 2001-04-27 13:00:00 ----

Since this works fine on my machine, and I know we used to have a bug like this
but it was fixed a while back, I'm going to mark it WORKSFORME. If someone can
still reproduce it, please reopen this bug and add info about Nautilus version,
platform, etc.



------- Additional Comments From liblit@acm.org 2001-04-27 13:36:33 ----

I am certainly still seeing the bug as recently as version 1.0.2, installed
using "nautilus-1.0.2-ximian.2.i386.rpm" as part of Ximian's GNOME 1.4
distribution.  I'm on a Red Hat 7.1 / Linux 2.4.3 / Intel box.

<sullivan@eazel.com>, when you say that it works fine for you, are you using
something more recent than 1.0.2?



------- Additional Comments From sullivan@eazel.com 2001-04-27 14:10:45 ----

Yes, I'm using CVS HEAD. So maybe this was fixed since 1.0.2, or maybe it was
re-broken by Ximian's packaging somehow?

Can anyone reproduce this with the CVS HEAD build?



------- Additional Comments From liblit@acm.org 2001-04-27 14:36:27 ----

OK, if you are not seeing the bug in CVS HEAD, then I'm pretty willing to 
believe that it was fixed some time after 1.0.2.  That easily explains why I'm 
seeing it and you're not.

Of course, it would be really swell if some Nautilus developer could positively 
affirm having fixed the bug....



------- Additional Comments From don@eazel.com 2001-05-01 12:38:01 ----

Not a 1.0.3 blocker.  Moving to "later" as P3.




------- Additional Comments From liblit@acm.org 2001-07-05 11:33:56 ----

In earlier discussions on this bug, there was some question about whether it had
been fixed in a more recent release than the reporter (me) was using.  For the
record, I'm now using 1.0.3 and still seeing the bug just as originally
reported.  :-(



------- Additional Comments From snickell@stanford.edu 2001-07-23 00:32:21 ----

Taking bugs previously assigned to Pavel, assigning them to myself. Will parse
them out at my leisure , but many are GnomeVFS bugs we should look at for 2.0



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 21:19 -------
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-01-05 04:20:31 UTC
Changing to "old" target milestone for all bugs laying around with no milestone set.
Comment 2 Andrew Sobala 2002-06-06 23:31:07 UTC
Still happening
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2002-06-06 23:35:51 UTC
Is this possibly a gnome-vfs problem, not a nautilus problem?
Comment 4 John Fleck 2002-11-18 04:07:02 UTC
FYI, I still have this difficult with 2.1.2.
Comment 5 Rolf Kulemann 2003-01-05 19:55:08 UTC
Nautilus 2.1.5 still shows broken links at that url.
Comment 6 Ben Liblit 2003-06-26 23:28:02 UTC
Nautilus 2.2.1, still broken.
Comment 7 Julien Olivier 2003-11-28 10:33:01 UTC
Seems of a dup of bug #92615
Comment 8 Andrew Sobala 2003-11-28 11:24:39 UTC
*** Bug 92615 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Mark Finlay 2003-11-28 12:06:19 UTC
Bug 92615 statest that this is not a gnome-vfs problem.
Comment 10 Matthew Gatto 2004-04-03 19:02:39 UTC
Still in GNOME-2.6, bumping Version accordingly.
Comment 11 Matthew Gatto 2004-04-03 19:03:38 UTC
*** Bug 135461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Fredrik Wendt 2004-07-25 11:28:58 UTC
Perhaps obvious, but this is also true for sftp, using Nautilus 2.6.3. The
workaround (sort of) is to simply enter the name of the symlink in the location
bar (ending with a slash /).
Comment 13 Fredrik Wendt 2004-07-25 11:50:01 UTC
With the ssh:// protocol the folder symlinks show up properly, but can't be
opened with double click.
Comment 14 Matthew Gatto 2004-10-19 23:10:31 UTC
*** Bug 144057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Matthew Gatto 2004-11-06 09:37:40 UTC
Seems to pretty much work now starting in 2.8, can somebody else who was
experiencing this on previous versions confirm/test?
Comment 16 Julien Olivier 2004-11-08 09:24:55 UTC
It works for me in Nautilus but not in the file selection dialog (it opens the
link as if it were a file). But maybe it's a different bug.
Comment 17 Christophe Fergeau 2004-11-17 21:37:44 UTC
Please please please, don't make a mess of this bug. sftp and ftp are two
different code bases, so whoever retitled this bug from "ftp symlink support is
broken" and talked about sftp was wrong doing it in this bug.
ftp support works for me in GNOME 2.8, I believe it was fixed in that version.
sftp symlinks are known to be broken, but put your comments about that in bug
#153679
Closing this bug, if ftp symlinks have issues for you in 2.8, please reopen this
bug, if you have additionnal remarks about sftp symlinks, please put them in bug
#153679