GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 456611
crash in Tasks: Reading mail in evolutio...
Last modified: 2007-07-17 19:03:12 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Reading mail in evolution Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 187998208 vsize: 187998208 resident: 90099712 share: 40431616 rss: 90099712 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1184334346 rtime: 4519 utime: 4323 stime: 196 cutime:193 cstime: 14 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208776992 (LWP 26336)] [New Thread -1356092528 (LWP 27594)] [New Thread -1314133104 (LWP 27593)] [New Thread -1262949488 (LWP 26514)] [New Thread -1313866864 (LWP 26472)] [New Thread -1252447344 (LWP 26377)] [New Thread -1231074416 (LWP 26375)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0011c402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 147795
Thread 1 (Thread -1208776992 (LWP 26336))
----------- .xsession-errors (24 sec old) --------------------- Decreasing itip formatter search count to 1 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 0 Increasing itip formatter search count to 1 Increasing itip formatter search count to 2 Increasing itip formatter search count to 3 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 2 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 1 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 0 Increasing itip formatter search count to 1 Increasing itip formatter search count to 2 Increasing itip formatter search count to 3 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 2 Decreasing itip formatter search count to 1 Decreasing i (evolution:26336): libecal-WARNING **: e-cal.c:317: Unexpected response --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433922 ***