After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 434677 - crash in Time and Date: try to synchronize the c...
crash in Time and Date: try to synchronize the c...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358383
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-30 18:52 UTC by golqmidiot
Modified: 2007-05-01 02:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description golqmidiot 2007-04-30 18:52:15 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
try to synchronize the clock with internet server


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 38842368 vsize: 0 resident: 38842368 share: 0 rss: 16211968 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1177958841 rtime: 0 utime: 290 stime: 0 cutime:274 cstime: 0 timeout: 16 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225340656 (LWP 12386)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225340656 (LWP 12386))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_unblock_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-01 02:10:34 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358383 ***