After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 428344 - crash in Evolution: Creating an email with p...
crash in Evolution: Creating an email with p...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 367863
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-10 19:13 UTC by frankhieber
Modified: 2007-04-11 16:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description frankhieber 2007-04-10 19:13:30 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Creating an email with photo attachments



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 304902144 vsize: 0 resident: 304902144 share: 0 rss: 52023296 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1176153392 rtime: 0 utime: 5026 stime: 0 cutime:4596 cstime: 0 timeout: 430 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232894288 (LWP 13591)]
[New Thread -1383072864 (LWP 13736)]
[New Thread -1377760352 (LWP 13656)]
[New Thread -1369359456 (LWP 13654)]
[New Thread -1360966752 (LWP 13653)]
[New Thread -1351521376 (LWP 13646)]
[New Thread -1342735456 (LWP 13638)]
[New Thread -1334342752 (LWP 13637)]
[New Thread -1325950048 (LWP 13634)]
[New Thread -1287656544 (LWP 13632)]
[New Thread -1279263840 (LWP 13631)]
[New Thread -1267770464 (LWP 13629)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1232894288 (LWP 13591))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_attachment_bar_remove_selected
    at e-attachment-bar.c line 478
  • #6 key_press_event
    at e-msg-composer.c line 3757
  • #7 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_widget_get_default_style
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_window_propagate_key_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_window_activate_key
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 bonobo_window_remove_popup
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #16 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_value_set_boxed
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_widget_get_default_style
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 _gdk_events_init
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #30 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-04-11 16:18:42 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 367863 ***