After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 395497 - crash in Time and Date: installing ntp for synch...
crash in Time and Date: installing ntp for synch...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358383
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-11 18:22 UTC by gautamkowshik
Modified: 2007-01-11 19:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description gautamkowshik 2007-01-11 18:22:13 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
installing ntp for synchronizing time and date


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 56909824 vsize: 0 resident: 56909824 share: 0 rss: 17879040 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168539258 rtime: 0 utime: 519 stime: 0 cutime:514 cstime: 0 timeout: 5 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225906512 (LWP 12082)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225906512 (LWP 12082))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_block_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Damien Durand 2007-01-11 19:36:52 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358383 ***