After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 371791 - crash in Time and Date: j'ai essayé de synchroni...
crash in Time and Date: j'ai essayé de synchroni...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358383
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-07 00:06 UTC by spoonman
Modified: 2006-11-07 14:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description spoonman 2006-11-07 00:06:49 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
j'ai essayé de synchroniser, mais le temps de réponse était anormalement lent...
J'ai fait un arrêt forcé de l'application


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 56455168 vsize: 0 resident: 56455168 share: 0 rss: 15802368 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162857624 rtime: 0 utime: 293 stime: 0 cutime:284 cstime: 0 timeout: 9 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225447152 (LWP 9935)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225447152 (LWP 9935))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_unblock_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-11-07 14:02:50 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358383 ***