After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 354824 - crash in Evolution: Just attempting to read ...
crash in Evolution: Just attempting to read ...
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Do Not Use
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Harish Krishnaswamy
Evolution QA team
: 357369 357639 358765 359401 359907 362594 363600 363839 375394 377989 378547 386084 413132 420225 424105 424404 433621 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-07 17:55 UTC by Michael R Head
Modified: 2013-09-13 12:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Michael R Head 2006-09-07 17:55:14 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Just attempting to read my email while evolution was scanning IMAP folders for new mail, a few minutes after startup.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 170307584 vsize: 0 resident: 170307584 share: 0 rss: 67104768 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157651462 rtime: 0 utime: 3236 stime: 0 cutime:3054 cstime: 0 timeout: 182 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232279888 (LWP 9549)]
[New Thread -1318773856 (LWP 9777)]
[New Thread -1310381152 (LWP 9776)]
[New Thread -1277969504 (LWP 9751)]
[New Thread -1287345248 (LWP 9687)]
[New Thread -1268921440 (LWP 9685)]
[New Thread -1260528736 (LWP 9683)]
[New Thread -1252136032 (LWP 9682)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 71823

Thread 1 (Thread -1232279888 (LWP 9549))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 874
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_table_state_load_from_node
    at e-table-state.c line 166
  • #6 e_table_state_load_from_file
    at e-table-state.c line 128
  • #7 gal_view_etable_load
    at gal-view-etable.c line 96
  • #8 gal_view_load
    at gal-view.c line 76
  • #9 gal_view_collection_real_load_view_from_file
    at gal-view-collection.c line 346
  • #10 gal_view_instance_load
    at gal-view-instance.c line 296
  • #11 emfv_setup_view_instance
    at em-folder-view.c line 593
  • #12 emfv_set_folder
    at em-folder-view.c line 674
  • #13 emfb_set_folder
    at em-folder-browser.c line 1810
  • #14 emfv_got_folder
    at em-folder-view.c line 689
  • #15 get_folder_got
    at mail-ops.c line 1230
  • #16 mail_msgport_replied
    at mail-mt.c line 461
  • #17 g_io_unix_dispatch
    at giounix.c line 162
  • #18 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2045
  • #19 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2677
  • #20 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #21 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #22 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Christian Kirbach





          2006-09-09 09:24:38 UTC
        



strange trace matches Bug 215344 which is ancient...






Comment 2


André Klapper





          2006-09-11 12:24:56 UTC
        



etable bug.






Comment 3


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-23 22:04:38 UTC
        



*** Bug 357369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-23 22:07:21 UTC
        



Bug 357369 is the same reporter, perfectly matching stacktrace. However, the description is interesting:

> I believe I was just switching windows using compiz, because I wasn't
> directly interacting with evo itself.

Possible cause?







Comment 5


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-09-25 20:02:52 UTC
        



*** Bug 357639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 6


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-01 12:51:23 UTC
        



*** Bug 358765 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 7


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-03 20:47:24 UTC
        



*** Bug 359401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 8


André Klapper





          2006-10-05 15:14:31 UTC
        



*** Bug 359907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 9


André Klapper





          2006-10-05 15:15:01 UTC
        



we're getting more and more duplicates of this one here, targetting to 2.8.1.






Comment 10


Michael R Head





          2006-10-05 16:25:12 UTC
        



I haven't yet seen it with 2.8.1 (just got it a day or two from Edgy)...






Comment 11


Rob Bradford





          2006-10-16 13:13:16 UTC
        



*** Bug 362594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 12


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-22 18:39:24 UTC
        



Note: Bug 363839 possibly is another duplicate. However, there's one notable
      difference in the stacktrace, namely a NULL filename argument in the
      gal_view_load() call in bug 363839.







Comment 13


André Klapper





          2006-11-17 23:29:46 UTC
        



*** Bug 375394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 14


Iestyn Pryce





          2006-11-24 17:06:19 UTC
        



*** Bug 378547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 15


Sebastien Bacher





          2006-11-28 11:29:38 UTC
        



Ubuntu bug about that: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/73478






Comment 16


ebbywiselyn





          2006-12-08 04:44:46 UTC
        



*** Bug 377989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 17


palfrey





          2006-12-15 16:47:21 UTC
        



*** Bug 386084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 18


Susana





          2007-03-01 10:42:15 UTC
        



*** Bug 413132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 19


Akhil Laddha





          2007-03-20 10:56:49 UTC
        



*** Bug 420225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 20


Akhil Laddha





          2007-03-30 05:31:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 424105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 21


André Klapper





          2007-04-12 20:59:30 UTC
        



*** Bug 424404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 22


André Klapper





          2007-04-12 20:59:35 UTC
        



*** Bug 363600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 23


André Klapper





          2007-04-12 20:59:39 UTC
        



*** Bug 363839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 24


palfrey





          2007-04-26 15:45:28 UTC
        



*** Bug 433621 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 25


Brian J. Murrell





          2007-11-23 14:34:22 UTC
        



I'd say this one has missed it's target milestone by quite a bit.  Is it fixed?  Can we close it if so?  If not, perhaps a new target milestone?

Does somebody not actually do any of this bookkeeping when a release is made?  When a milestone is reached, somebody should look for all of the said milestone targets that did not make it and re-target them.  The only thing left on a milestone at a release should be closed items.

Anyway...






Comment 26


André Klapper





          2007-11-26 12:52:24 UTC
        



> I'd say this one has missed it's target milestone by quite a bit.  Is it fixed?
> Can we close it if so?  If not, perhaps a new target milestone?

if it was fixed, it would be closed. ;-)
imo, evolution does not use the milestone settings anymore.






Comment 27


André Klapper





          2008-09-28 21:17:56 UTC
        



No new duplicats for nearly 18 months. Closing as OBSOLETE.