GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 266535
spousal information entry should allow copy of data
Last modified: 2005-08-26 07:53:31 UTC
Currently the 'spouse' system in the address book is simply a text field, but it would be great if it was a bit more of a connection between two contact entries. IE: I enter 'bob jones' and all his contact and address information into my addressbook. If his wife 'jane' is important to me I would enter her in as well, first as his spouse, but then a full new address book entry for her. Probably 50% of the information (home phone#, address) could be potentially the same for these two people, but I have to enter it twice. I can see the evolution contact manager creating a system where when you enter in a spouse ('jane') it searches the addressbook for 'jane jones' and then 'jane' and pops these up with a 'are any of these the people you mean?' message. If not, then it would ask if I wanted to do an 'edit full' for 'jane jones' and if so, duplicated bob's information with the exception of obvious non-applicable data (name). These days even IMs aren't person specific, so even this and email addresses are POTENTIALLY duplicatible. If the user decided they didn't want a full entry, the system would leave it as it is now, just a note saying that bob's spouse is jane. If the user did have a full address card for the second user, it could display an icon by the spouse's name, where clicking it would bring up the address book entry (or just indicating that there is a different entry for this). I guess this might bring up a lot of questions about should the data stay synced up, should you be able to not edit one contact card or not, but I say just have this as a quick and user-friendly way to edit a spouses address card without too much fuss or confusion. I realize this goes a bit beyond the paradigm of a set of address cards, but after using the contact manager a bit as a user, and having several friends with spouses and having to go through adding and cutting and pasting duplicate information around, a system like this could be a real plus to people using evolution.
adding dependency.
similar to 262002 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 262002 ***