After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 212106 - Enhancement Request: per-user encryption
Enhancement Request: per-user encryption
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 204029
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 215010 216990 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 212661
 
 
Reported: 2001-10-09 15:12 UTC by Steve Murphy
Modified: 2002-05-27 07:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Steve Murphy 2001-10-09 15:12:51 UTC
Would it be possible to add an option to the contacts, whereby an individual 
could be marked as "preferring" encrypted mail?

When you reply or forward or send a letter to this individual, the "encrypt" 
option will be turned on for that individual. The user should be able to
force it off before sending the letter, if they don't want encryption "this
time". 

Having a similar "Signing" option might not be that bad an idea, also.


It is very probable that you would like to encrypt to everyone in your
contacts, and anyone else who writes you, either. It is far more probable
that there are just a few individuals you would regularly write encrypted 
messages to. Thus, a per-person default would be more useful than a global
encryption default.

murf
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2001-10-09 23:36:09 UTC
this'd be nice...can you submit a bug to the addressbook saying it
should store this info and then make this bug depend on that bug?
thanks.
Comment 2 trow 2001-11-10 22:15:12 UTC
*** bug 215010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Heath Harrelson 2001-12-10 08:03:58 UTC
*** bug 216990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-05-27 07:20:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 204029 ***