After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 172300 - gnome-ui-properties "Detachable Menu bars"off by default, Handleboxes for Menus.
gnome-ui-properties "Detachable Menu bars"off by default, Handleboxes for Menus.
Status: VERIFIED WONTFIX
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Other Preferences
2.11.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-03-31 21:23 UTC by Alan Horkan
Modified: 2007-09-21 23:42 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Alan Horkan 2005-03-31 21:23:33 UTC
gnome-ui-properties should include an option "Detachable Menu bars" 

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/2005-March/msg00075.html
After a long discussion on the usability mailing list I feel that the
infrastructure to allow handle boxes on menus should be put in place but that it
should be turned off by default.  

this is merely exposing UI for an existing but largely ignored Gconf setting.  

By having it off by default the change can be introduced without upsetting the
status quo.  When gtk toolbars become more flexible and allow more varied
docking setups this will start to become more useful.  

Having this off by default reduces the risk of accidentally rearranging the
toolbars.  It has been suggested that it might also be wise to hide toolbar
handles by default but I'll file a seperate bug report for that later (and
probably bring it up on the desktop-devel list).
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2005-07-31 13:04:36 UTC
Is detaching the menus something really useful for users?
Comment 2 Sebastien Bacher 2005-08-14 16:53:39 UTC
Ccing usability, is "detaching the menus" an useful feature for users?
Comment 3 Vidar Braut Haarr 2005-08-14 19:12:15 UTC
I've never been asked by anyone if this is possible. If I told - for example -
my parents that it was possible, I think they'd just say "OK" and never think
about it again, and most certainly never use it.

The only application menus they use on a daily basis is the Bookmarks menu in
Epiphany and the File menu in AbiWord.

First of all, I think it's important to clarify what problem this functionality
is trying to solve. I have no idea.

I agree though that consistency is good, and also that it should be off by
default in any case - just as the handle on all toolbars should be off by default.

I also think they should be handled by the same option in gnome-ui-properties,
and not two seperate ones - if any.
Comment 4 Bastien Nocera 2007-02-15 16:37:07 UTC
IMO, this could be added to GConf, and applied by gnome-settings-daemon, but not in the UI. I don't think I've ever seen anyone use this functionality in a way that shouldn't be solved in the application. Eg. a bookmarks sidebar in epiphany, more toolbars items/customisation for Abiword.
Comment 5 Thomas Wood 2007-02-21 23:10:30 UTC
Is this bug made obsolete by the comments in bug 408295?
Comment 6 Bastien Nocera 2007-02-21 23:23:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is this bug made obsolete by the comments in bug 408295?

This bug is about detachable menus, bug 408295 about detachable toolbars. I'm still not convinced by the detachable menus (not anymore than I am about detachable toolbars...).
Comment 7 Thomas Wood 2007-02-21 23:29:10 UTC
Ah ok, I assumed this bug meant "detachable menubars". However, I agree that if we are currently removing the detachable toolbars option, it makes little sense to be adding a detachable menus option.
Comment 8 Jens Granseuer 2007-09-21 20:22:31 UTC
Closing, then.
Comment 9 Alan Horkan 2007-09-21 23:42:35 UTC
Oh well, I'll miss this old report.  

Maybe some future version of GTK will implement better toolbars without bothering developers with silly details and this whole issue will be as irrelevant as it always should have been.  

Thanks anyway though.