After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 116442 - Indic support not available in gnome-print
Indic support not available in gnome-print
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 102809
Product: gnome-print
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
: 128369 129251 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-07-01 05:32 UTC by Arun
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement

Attachments
Screen shot showing the exact nature of the bug in action (221.71 KB, image/png)
2003-12-03 05:34 UTC, Indranil Das Gupta 		Details
Sample Bengali (Indic script) text file as testcase (1.21 KB, text/plain)
2003-12-03 05:42 UTC, Indranil Das Gupta 		Details

Description Arun 2003-07-01 05:32:40 UTC 
Indic text (UTF) cant be printed using gnome-print. 
Rendering is not happening. It should be using pango ?
Comment 1 Andreas J. Guelzow 2003-11-19 21:23:50 UTC 
Could you please include a gnumeric 1.2.x file with indic text so that
we can try to implement this request. For those of us without any
knowledge of how to even enter indic text, this would be very
difficult to test.
Comment 2 Andreas J. Guelzow 2003-12-02 19:22:41 UTC 
*** Bug 128369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Indranil Das Gupta 2003-12-03 05:34:05 UTC 
Created attachment 22042 [details]
Screen shot showing the exact nature of the bug in action
Comment 4 Indranil Das Gupta 2003-12-03 05:42:01 UTC 
Created attachment 22043 [details]
Sample Bengali (Indic script) text file as testcase
Comment 5 Andreas J. Guelzow 2003-12-14 06:40:04 UTC 
*** Bug 129251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Owen Taylor 2004-06-04 14:27:36 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 102809 ***