GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 108313
Nautilus crashes (text view?)
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: nautilus Severity: critical Version: GNOME2.2.0 2.2.2 os_details: Gnome.Org Synopsis: Nautilus crashes (text view?) Bugzilla-Product: nautilus Bugzilla-Component: general BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1) Description: Description of Problem: Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Expected Results: How often does this happen? Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/home/gar/garnome/bin/nautilus' [New Thread 8192 (LWP 28247)] [New Thread 16385 (LWP 28253)] [New Thread 8194 (LWP 28254)] [New Thread 16387 (LWP 28255)] [New Thread 24580 (LWP 28256)] [New Thread 32773 (LWP 28257)] [New Thread 40966 (LWP 28258)] [New Thread 49159 (LWP 28259)] 0x420ae169 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
+ Trace 34855
Thread 8 (Thread 49159 (LWP 28259))
Thread 7 (Thread 40966 (LWP 28258))
Thread 6 (Thread 32773 (LWP 28257))
Thread 5 (Thread 24580 (LWP 28256))
Thread 4 (Thread 16387 (LWP 28255))
Thread 3 (Thread 8194 (LWP 28254))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-03-13 10:58 ------- The original reporter (mithrir@yahoo.com) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Appears to be a unique stack trace, according to the simple-dup-finder. Setting version->2.2.x; adding GNOMEVER2.2, STACKTRACE (due to the symbols), and bugsquad keywords; and marking as new.
I don't understand this bug? It seems to be when you "go back" from viewing a text file to the directory. Looking at the backtrace it seems view->details is NULL. But that sounds really weird. Can you reproduce this?
I believe that bug 116651 is a duplicate of this bug as the stack traces are a pretty close, though not perfect, match.
I don't think so, bug 116651 looks different, while this is a dup of bug 117931 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117931 ***
sorry, i mean 119407
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 119407 ***