After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 106253 - Display transactions in descending date order
Display transactions in descending date order
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 683881
Product: GnuCash
Classification: Other
Component: Register
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: David Hampton
Chris Shoemaker
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-02-16 20:42 UTC by Jose Bernardo Silva
Modified: 2018-06-29 20:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Jose Bernardo Silva 2003-02-16 20:42:27 UTC 
It would be nice if the option to reverse the sort order when
adding/editing entries in a account was available. According to warlord,
"the engine can do it, but there is no way to set it in the GUI."
Thanks!
Comment 1 Richard Gilligan 2004-08-11 03:13:14 UTC 
Some bank web sites display your account activity sorted newest to oldest.  Being able to reverse the 
sort order of the GC register would make it a lot easier visually compare a GC register and a bank web 
page. FIW.
Comment 2 Christian Stimming 2006-10-18 11:40:51 UTC 
Would also be implemented by bug#310567 although this request here is far easier.
Comment 3 Matt Price 2009-05-13 15:55:36 UTC 
just adding a note to say that this enhancement is still desirable.  In my case, it's because I am reconciling with an electronic bank statement that sorts in descending date order, not ascending.  This makes the simple visual reconciliation act rather more difficult than it needs to be.
Comment 4 Michalis 2014-05-08 21:56:36 UTC 
In current version, I can see in the "Sort by" option a "Reverse" checkbox that I believe does what is requested. Can somebody from the reporters please confirm?
Comment 5 Mike Evans 2014-05-09 08:40:09 UTC 
Thanks Michelis, It is indeed in there and was addressed in Bug 683881.  However as I say there I never finished it because at the time we were moving to register2 which would have made my work pointless.

Ill close this as duplicate of Bug 683881 which I should revisit perhaps.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 683881 ***
Comment 6 John Ralls 2018-06-29 20:28:34 UTC 
GnuCash bug tracking has moved to a new Bugzilla host. This bug has been copied to https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106253. Please update any external references or bookmarks.