After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 95597 - gpilotd-control-applet needs conduit tabs
gpilotd-control-applet needs conduit tabs
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-pilot
Classification: Other
Component: capplet
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-pilot Maintainers
gnome-pilot Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-12 09:32 UTC by Linus Walleij
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Linus Walleij 2002-10-12 09:32:43 UTC
Something is weird in the design of gpilotd-control-applet, the inventor
may speak his/her mind in response of this, but the idea to bring up a
basic controller (identifying devices etc) with

gpilotd-control-applet

without any command-line options, and to have the same applet bring up the
conduit interface with the command line option:

gpilotd-control-applet --cap-id=1

is not good, not intuituitive. Notably RedHat has broken their distribution
so that it is impossible to access the conduits from the menus, and also
Ximian evolution has a problem that is probably related.

My proposed solution to this is: by all means, keep that command-line
option if you like it, but PLEASE PLEASE add the conduits as a tab to the
interface of the dialog that is brought up when invoking
gpilotd-control-applet without any options. You often want to configure all
things at once, see, you might want to be able to configure conduits apart
from the rest (though I doubt it) but you ALWAYS want to configure conduits
at the same time you use the other configure options.

I am ready to create a patch for you if you accept this idea and don't have
the time to do it yourself.

This controller-applet behaviour has already caused severe problems for
users who don't realize the "obvious" idea of launching
"gpilotd-control-applet --cap-id=1" with that totally undocumented (am I
wrong?) switch.

Atleaste give me good reasons for why the controller-applet is built this way.
Comment 1 Linus Walleij 2002-10-29 13:26:48 UTC
Notice that this has been filed as a bug in RedHat bug tracker, and a
solution in the above style is available for RedHat. It has not been
confirmed to be merged with the official Gnome sources yet.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75345
Comment 2 JP Rosevear 2003-03-20 03:44:24 UTC
This change has been in for a while now.