After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 95008 - Don't assume ${prefix}/share != ${datadir}
Don't assume ${prefix}/share != ${datadir}
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Background
2.9.x
Other All
: Normal trivial
: ---
Assigned To: Rodney Dawes
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-06 16:53 UTC by The Written Word
Modified: 2005-02-10 05:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Attachments
Proposed patch. (637 bytes, patch)
2004-07-24 12:04 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review

Description The Written Word 2002-10-06 16:53:47 UTC
Should GNOME_ICONDIR be ${prefix}/share or ${datadir} in
libbackground/Makefile.am? The two are not always equivalent. I recommend
${datadir}.
Comment 1 Aschwin van der Woude 2002-12-14 15:51:28 UTC
Version 2.1.4 has the same.
Comment 2 Christian Neumair 2004-07-24 12:04:35 UTC
Thanks for your bug report.
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2004-07-24 12:04:59 UTC
Created attachment 29846 [details] [review]
Proposed patch.
Comment 4 Luis Villa 2005-01-02 16:33:31 UTC
Christian, have you emailed nautilus list about this? Let's nag Alex and get
this committed...
Comment 5 Martin Wehner 2005-01-29 21:42:25 UTC
Committed. Thanks Manny.
Comment 6 Martin Wehner 2005-01-29 22:14:44 UTC
I suck. I had to revert my commit because libbackground is just a link into
gnome-control-center. This bug/patch actually belongs there. Sorry.
Comment 7 Kjartan Maraas 2005-02-10 00:24:19 UTC
Isn't the patch correct regardless of whether it belongs in gnomecc or not? Can
we get this in?
Comment 8 Rodney Dawes 2005-02-10 05:11:32 UTC
I've just committed a patch to remove the line entirely. There's no need to
define the GNOME_ICONDIR variable at all, as the code doesn't use it.