After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 91543 - remove add_to_session preference
remove add_to_session preference
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other All
: High normal
: future
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-08-23 19:02 UTC by Havoc Pennington
Modified: 2005-08-15 01:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
ignore add_to_session (902 bytes, patch)
2002-08-23 19:02 UTC, Havoc Pennington
none Details | Review
Updated patch that applies cleanly (873 bytes, patch)
2004-02-20 06:32 UTC, alexander.winston
accepted-commit_after_freeze Details | Review

Description Havoc Pennington 2002-08-23 19:02:14 UTC
This preference is only useful for debugging, but sometimes gets 
messed up by users with the effect that you lose nautilus from the session
and can't get it back.

will attach patch.
Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-08-23 19:02:44 UTC
Created attachment 10675 [details] [review]
ignore add_to_session
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2002-08-23 19:03:13 UTC
(Of course my patch is incomplete, the setting should also be purged 
from the .schemas file and nautilus-global-preferences.c)
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2002-08-26 20:40:40 UTC
Adding PATCH and all that. Given that removing it from prefs would
change UI, this can't really go into 2.0, so I'm marking it 2.1.x.
Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2002-08-26 23:43:37 UTC
(not that it matters really, but it would not change UI, as 
the pref is just a hidden debug thing, not in the UI)
Comment 5 Havoc Pennington 2002-12-03 04:44:55 UTC
I seem to remember this being discussed and resolved on the 
mailing list?
Comment 6 Kjartan Maraas 2003-10-28 14:27:29 UTC
The pref is still there though. What to do?
Comment 7 alexander.winston 2004-02-20 06:32:06 UTC
I am attaching a new patch that applies cleanly to CVS revision HEAD.
Adding appropriate GNOMEVER keywords, modifying versions, and bumping
priority because of the PATCH.
Comment 8 alexander.winston 2004-02-20 06:32:38 UTC
Created attachment 24597 [details] [review]
Updated patch that applies cleanly
Comment 9 Dave Camp 2004-04-27 21:03:18 UTC
Comment on attachment 24597 [details] [review]
Updated patch that applies cleanly

looks ok to me, we'll commit after the freeze
Comment 10 Alexander Larsson 2004-08-16 10:39:21 UTC
The latest patch doesn't work. it lacks parts of the initial patch.
I fixed it up and removed other references to the preference.