After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 84802 - Bad keyboard navigation issue for the panel
Bad keyboard navigation issue for the panel
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 87275
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: general
1.5.x
Other other
: High normal
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-10 22:05 UTC by Gaute Lindkvist
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
patch: adds a keybinding for applications menu with alt+F3 (9.43 KB, patch)
2002-06-19 15:11 UTC, deepa
none Details | Review
patch: shows the keybinding alt+F3 in gnome-keybinding-properties dialog (1.65 KB, patch)
2002-06-19 16:13 UTC, deepa
none Details | Review

Description Gaute Lindkvist 2002-06-10 22:05:43 UTC
Possibly not a bug, but nevertheless turns out that way.

To open the application-menu or the foot-menu, you currently have to do it
in two operations:
1. ctrl-alt-tab to the panel
2. press F10

Even worse: it's very poorly documented. Finding out how to do this can be
quite a challenge even for non-newbies.

But: the immensly less used menu for applets can be accessed with a single
operation.

Opening the foot-menu or the application menu _needs_ a global
keyboard-shortcut.

I don't use this myself, as I'm a bit of a mouse-person, but I think this
is a GNOME 2.0 blocker if GNOME 2.0 is to be the accessibility release.

And: it is is a regression from GNOME 1.4.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-06-12 15:04:27 UTC
Well, it isn't an accessibility issue, as ctl+alt+tab is perfectly
sufficient for those requirements, but it does seem sort of dumb that
neither of these are accessible via the keyboard shortcuts configuration.
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2002-06-18 11:00:48 UTC
This is partly a quirk of the current panel implementation-- you
shouldn't really have to press F10 to open the Applications menu once
the menu panel has focus, you should just be able to tab along to the
menu like any other object on the panel.  However, it's currently not
technically possible to do this-- hopefully the menu applet will one
day replace the existing Applications and Actions menus and make this
work more inuitively.

I agree that a definable keybinding to open the Applications (and
maybe the Actions) menu would be really useful, though, provided it
also worked when the menu panel wasn't visible-- in 1.4 I used to have
it turned off because it's a complete waste of space, but now that
it's the quickest way to launch programs I have to leave it on my
desktop :/
Comment 3 deepa 2002-06-19 15:11:48 UTC
Created attachment 9326 [details] [review]
patch: adds a keybinding for applications menu with alt+F3
Comment 4 deepa 2002-06-19 15:45:58 UTC
Per Calum, created a patch above that will popup the applications 
menu if Alt+F3 is pressed.
Comment 5 deepa 2002-06-19 16:13:38 UTC
Created attachment 9328 [details] [review]
patch: shows the keybinding alt+F3 in gnome-keybinding-properties dialog
Comment 6 Luis Villa 2002-07-02 16:25:50 UTC
Given that this changes strings, Mark, can we get this in ASAP, please?
Comment 7 bill.haneman 2002-07-03 18:05:48 UTC
This bug was about the foot menu wasn't it?  I think Alt-F1 should pop
up the GNOME (foot) menu (rather than a panel menu), and I believe
Owen Taylor has requested this change as well.

From the foot menu, one can get to the application menu and actions
menu (since they are contained in the foot menu).  This is probably
the easier path for the keynav user.

I am uncomfortable with the Alt-F3 patch since we need to conserve
Func-key bindings for other window manager keybindings.

(Calum and I have agreed about this, he's reading over my shoulder ;-)

Is this solution agreeable?
Comment 8 Calum Benson 2002-07-03 18:18:39 UTC
Have just raised bug #87275 suggesting the same solution...
Comment 9 Glynn Foster 2002-07-04 14:41:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 87275 ***