After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 83964 - Launcher properties should be integrated into the nautilus properties dialog
Launcher properties should be integrated into the nautilus properties dialog
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Visual Design
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other Linux
: High enhancement
: future
Assigned To: James Willcox
Nautilus Maintainers
: 84045 84356 85970 91366 91825 93174 99987 102000 110728 117905 123057 135782 140323 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-06-03 12:20 UTC by Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail]
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Attachments
first crack at implementing this [ crack ] (9.78 KB, patch)
2002-09-19 19:55 UTC, jacob berkman
none Details | Review
better version of this (13.12 KB, patch)
2002-09-30 20:15 UTC, jacob berkman
none Details | Review
Modified patch (fixes some issues) (14.84 KB, patch)
2002-10-18 16:01 UTC, Dennis Cranston
none Details | Review

Description Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-03 12:20:29 UTC
Launcher properties should be integrated into the nautilus properties
dialog, there should not be a seperate edit launchers option in the context
menus when in any directory. Also launcher properties should be available
for all launchers regardless of the directory they are in.
Comment 1 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-04 14:22:37 UTC
*** Bug 84045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-06 14:36:19 UTC
*** Bug 84356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-19 18:48:28 UTC
*** Bug 85970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-07-19 14:01:34 UTC
ccing usability
Comment 5 Calum Benson 2002-07-24 18:27:45 UTC
Sounds sensible to me.
Comment 6 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-08-28 20:21:06 UTC
*** Bug 91825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-09-13 17:49:47 UTC
*** Bug 93174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 jacob berkman 2002-09-17 17:11:40 UTC
where is the "edit launcher options" in the context menu?  i don't see
it anywhere.
Comment 9 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-09-18 14:36:06 UTC
jacob it only appears when you're in the applications:// directory,
another reason the current mechanism is bad :)
Comment 10 jacob berkman 2002-09-18 15:13:50 UTC
ok, i see it now.

thanks.
Comment 11 jacob berkman 2002-09-19 15:36:40 UTC
i'm working on this...
Comment 12 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-09-19 15:49:24 UTC
jacob,

i think alex mentioned that he may have started doing some work on
this as well so you might want to check with him about it.
Comment 13 jacob berkman 2002-09-19 19:54:51 UTC
i talked to him briefly yesterday and i don't think he started it.

here's a patch which implements this.

dave, alex, thoughts?
Comment 14 jacob berkman 2002-09-19 19:55:45 UTC
Created attachment 11175 [details] [review]
first crack at implementing this [ crack ]
Comment 15 jacob berkman 2002-09-30 20:15:19 UTC
Created attachment 11317 [details] [review]
better version of this
Comment 16 mike 2002-09-30 22:50:14 UTC
tested this against yesterdays cvs
It adds a properties tab when within applications:///
other files unchanged ie: no launcher properties for desktop launchers
Comment 17 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-10-07 20:57:14 UTC
*** Bug 91366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Luis Villa 2002-10-16 21:36:50 UTC
Adding patch keyword.
Comment 19 mike 2002-10-17 05:51:08 UTC
Is there any reason why the patch hasnt made it into the tree? -
tested it and worked fine
Comment 20 Alexander Larsson 2002-10-18 15:53:07 UTC
Yes. I reviewed it on the mailing list.
Comment 21 Dennis Cranston 2002-10-18 16:01:08 UTC
Created attachment 11663 [details] [review]
Modified patch (fixes some issues)
Comment 22 Dennis Cranston 2002-10-18 16:10:29 UTC
I have attached a modified version of Jacob's patch.  It contains the
following changes.

1.  It moves the position of the launcher tab to the end in the
properties window.  

2.  It adds a should_show_launcher() function to be consistant with
the emblem and permission code.  So, we are not always creating the
launcher tab.  

3.  It fixes ditem_type_changed().  It saves the
GNOME_DESKTOP_ITEM_TYPE change.

Can I commit this to CVS (HEAD branch)?

Thanks,
Dennis
Comment 23 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-11-03 12:50:57 UTC
Unfortunately this won't happen for 2.2 because of feature freeze.
Marking priority high and milestone future.
Comment 24 Alexander Larsson 2002-11-04 12:10:57 UTC
Also, any new work on this should use the pluggable property pages stuff.
Comment 25 Luis Villa 2002-11-07 19:46:35 UTC
Apologies for the spam- I'm removing 'bugsquad' from some keywords via the web
interface. This is a one-time only thing before I re-add bugsquad via the SQL
interface, which will generate no mail. Apologies again.
Comment 26 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-11-30 17:34:13 UTC
*** Bug 99987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Aschwin van der Woude 2002-12-29 07:31:23 UTC
*** Bug 102000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Mark Finlay 2002-12-29 10:10:21 UTC
Does this allow you to edit desktop launchers yet? what about
launchers in other directories? I see no reason to limit it to
applications://
Comment 29 Elijah Newren 2003-01-20 22:59:26 UTC
Adding myself to the cc list.

mike@redtux.demon.co.uk's first comment and Mark Finlay's comment
above seem to imply that desktop launchers have not been included in
any of the fixes so far.  Is this true?  If so, why?  Thanks.
Comment 30 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2003-01-21 05:23:36 UTC
See alex's comments above. This patch needs to be reworked to use the
nautilus pluggable properties page api.
Comment 31 Alex Duggan 2003-04-14 06:05:09 UTC
*** Bug 110728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Alex Duggan 2003-04-14 06:07:25 UTC
removing GNOMEVER2.0 and adding myself to cc
Comment 33 Mårten Woxberg 2003-07-09 22:29:02 UTC
Anything happening on this front?

seems like bug 105751 is a duplicate of this bug.

If it is a .desktop file it should use the launcher-properties right?
or should it read the file and find out what it is?
Comment 34 Luis Villa 2003-09-25 14:05:18 UTC
This isn't a dupe of 105751, really, though tangentially related.
Reassigning to dave.
Comment 35 Luis Villa 2004-02-14 04:55:21 UTC
Removing patch since the patch is no longer applicable.
Comment 36 Martin Wehner 2004-04-17 15:21:30 UTC
*** Bug 117905 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Martin Wehner 2004-04-17 15:22:35 UTC
*** Bug 140323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Martin Wehner 2004-04-17 15:24:50 UTC
*** Bug 123057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Dave Camp 2004-04-27 21:07:21 UTC
Comment on attachment 11663 [details] [review]
Modified patch (fixes some issues)

marking all the patches as obsolete, as per luis' earlier comment.
Comment 40 Dave Camp 2004-04-27 21:08:30 UTC
snorp wanted to work on this, so i'm assigning to him.

Some .desktop-specific stuff should probably be done in an extension, but we
probably want the icon changing to work directly on the .desktop file if possible.
Comment 41 Dave Camp 2004-04-27 21:31:14 UTC
*** Bug 135782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Vincent Noel 2004-08-04 17:35:34 UTC
It seems it is now possible to edit launcher properties from nautilus properties
page. Can this bug be closed, or is there still work to do on this ?
Comment 43 James Willcox 2004-08-04 17:45:04 UTC
Yep, this is done.  Closing.