After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 753494 - validate: launcher: Add support for relative path while providing file path
validate: launcher: Add support for relative path while providing file path
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gst-devtools
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: 1.9.1
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2015-08-11 07:39 UTC by Vineeth
Modified: 2016-06-04 13:38 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
support for relative path (1.11 KB, patch)
2015-08-11 07:42 UTC, Vineeth
committed Details | Review

Description Vineeth 2015-08-11 07:39:53 UTC
While running validate with file path, right now we have to use full absolute path to specify it.
With this change, we can directly provide relative path for the same.

Already submitted for folder path, but missed for file path.
Comment 1 Vineeth 2015-08-11 07:42:08 UTC
Created attachment 309050 [details] [review]
support for relative path
Comment 2 Vineeth 2015-11-11 00:31:42 UTC
ping :)
Comment 3 Thibault Saunier 2015-11-11 09:08:12 UTC
Review of attachment 309050 [details] [review]:

ok
Comment 4 Vineeth 2015-12-22 06:23:19 UTC
ping :)
Comment 5 Vineeth 2016-02-17 07:01:46 UTC
ping :)
Comment 6 Tim-Philipp Müller 2016-06-04 11:52:28 UTC
commit 99f9f3f40805dc48f3acd8e2b7262ecc90caad94
Author: Vineeth TM <vineeth.tm@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 11 16:41:20 2015 +0900

    validate:launcher: Add support for relative path while providing file path
    
    Instead of providing full absolute path while validating the file, should be
    able to provide the relative path with respect to the present directory.
    
    https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753494
Comment 7 Thibault Saunier 2016-06-04 13:38:59 UTC
Thanks Tim, that one went out of my radar, not sure why.