GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 720029
docs/etc: Fix typos
Last modified: 2013-12-07 17:39:41 UTC
I noticed several typos when fixing the GStreamer documentaiton, the attached patches fixes the ones I have noticed. I divided the typo fixes into patches for the documentation, for docs/random, for debug/error messages and finally a patch only for patches in comments (that are not part of the documentation). I hope this makes it easier for you to choose what parts you care about and what parts you want to ignore (may random and comments..?).
Created attachment 263713 [details] [review] Proposed patch fixing typos in documentation
Created attachment 263714 [details] [review] Proposed patch fixing typos in "random" documentation
Created attachment 263715 [details] [review] Proposed patch fixing typos in debug and error messages
Created attachment 263716 [details] [review] Proposed patch fixing typos in non-documentation comments
Comment on attachment 263714 [details] [review] Proposed patch fixing typos in "random" documentation I don't think we should touch these. Maybe we should go through them and remove what's not current or interesting any longer.
> I don't think we should touch these. Maybe we should go through them and remove > what's not current or interesting any longer. I anticipated that, this is is why they are in a separate patch. It seems kind of awkward for GStreamer to have a scratch pad in the git repo, but ok... ;) I'm not sure I'm qualified to go through other peoples scratch pad documents and throw stuff away though.
Thanks pushed commit 53ae1b2c9c160a98a338adbb8a7ded0cad8eeebe Author: Sebastian Rasmussen <sebras@hotmail.com> Date: Sat Dec 7 15:38:19 2013 +0100 docs: Fix typos in function/object descriptions Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720029 commit e8ecf3c407e6733232013fafc52af8c98e931bc6 Author: Sebastian Rasmussen <sebras@hotmail.com> Date: Sat Dec 7 15:40:32 2013 +0100 Fix some typos in code comments and debug messages https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720029 > It seems kind of awkward for GStreamer to > have a scratch pad in the git repo, but ok... ;) I don't think it's awkward. It's somewhere where it can easily be found. It provides a history of people's ideas. And it seems to provide a better historical record than more transient things such as certain wikis.
> Thanks pushed Thanks for reviewing them. > > It seems kind of awkward for GStreamer to > > have a scratch pad in the git repo, but ok... ;) > > I don't think it's awkward. It's somewhere where it can easily be found. It > provides a history of people's ideas. And it seems to provide a better > historical record than more transient things such as certain wikis. Mmm, I have found somewhere that there are some links in the documentation to a GStreamer wiki-page on how to submit patches. Of course the wiki no longer has the page...
It may still be recovered/revived, haven't had a chance to look into that again lately.