After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 70976 - Vertical toolbars should be mentioned in the HIG
Vertical toolbars should be mentioned in the HIG
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-devel-docs
Classification: Applications
Component: hig
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Kathy Fernandes
Kathy Fernandes
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-02-08 22:04 UTC by Christian Rose
Modified: 2020-12-04 18:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Christian Rose 2002-02-08 22:04:49 UTC
I think that vertical toolbars (and proper advice regarding vertical
toolbars) should be mentioned in the toolbars section of the HIG.
Comment 1 Calum Benson 2002-03-06 17:31:02 UTC
I added a note on vertical toolbars at:
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/draft_hig/toolbars.html#vertical-toolbars

However much I tried, though, the best advice I could come up with is
"it's almost always better not to use them" :)  If anyone has some
better advice, feel free to comment....
Comment 2 Seth Nickell 2002-03-07 22:12:19 UTC
It was pretty trivial to remove the vertical toolbar from
GnomeMeeting. It had far far far more toolbar items than it needed.
Not sure its a very good example. 

Actually, not sure there are any good examples, because my personal
feeling is that we should avoid the "toolbar bloat" ala Microsoft
Office. At some point toolbars lose their usefulness because they have
too many items, and you might as well encourage menu use instead and
leave the toolbar for the truly common items.

If the user wants to turn on 20 toolbars and make some of them
vertical, they can go right ahead, but I don't think applications
should have more than one or two, toolbars visible by default.
Comment 3 Seth Nickell 2002-03-07 22:12:50 UTC
marking fixed