After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 658501 - UI strings should be marked translatable
UI strings should be marked translatable
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: conduit
Classification: Other
Component: documentation and translation
0.3.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: conduit-maint@gnome.bugs
conduit-maint@gnome.bugs
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-09-07 19:40 UTC by Olivier Berger
Modified: 2018-07-01 09:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Olivier Berger 2011-09-07 19:40:20 UTC 
Hi.

I think some strings should be marked as translatable (translatable="yes") in the UI XML file (conduit.ui).

See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=conduit.patch;att=1;bug=640403 for some such proposed changes.

Also, one should make sure they end-up in the .pot file, as, in the tests I've made on trying to repackage such patched sources for Debian, this didn't happen :-/ See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640403 for more details.

Best regards,
Comment 1 Olivier Berger 2011-09-07 21:02:07 UTC 
The second part on the presence in the .pot is no longer a problem on current trunk as the POTFILES.in is already correct.

Still, I think that the UI.py changes are still needed (see Debian bug report for my proposed patches).
Comment 2 Olivier Berger 2011-09-07 21:40:18 UTC 
Oh, and while at it, "Regresh Group" should be corrected to "Refresh Group" in conduit.ui IMHO, before translators make a new round of work.
Comment 3 Moony22 2014-01-10 13:44:22 UTC 
Is someone working on this bug? If not, I am happy to work on it as my first bug-fixing contribution to the gnome project.

Thanks.
Comment 4 Moony22 2014-01-10 13:44:39 UTC 
Is someone working on this bug? If not, I am happy to work on it as my first bug-fixing contribution to the gnome project.

Thanks.
Comment 5 André Klapper 2018-07-01 09:05:35 UTC 
Conduit is not under active development anymore, has not seen code changes for eight years, and saw its last tarball release in 2010.
Its codebase has been archived: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/conduit/commits/master

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect reality. Please feel free to reopen this ticket (or rather transfer the project to GNOME Gitlab, as GNOME Bugzilla is deprecated) if anyone takes the responsibility for active development again.