After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 626247 - Migrate from PyGTK to PyGObject introspection-based bindings
Migrate from PyGTK to PyGObject introspection-based bindings
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: emerillon
Classification: Other
Component: Plugins
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: emerillon-maint
emerillon-maint
Depends on:
Blocks: 626218
 
 
Reported: 2010-08-06 16:33 UTC by André Klapper
Modified: 2011-08-31 11:17 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.31/2.32



Description André Klapper 2010-08-06 16:33:26 UTC
Grep'ing for pygtk-2.0 it seems that this module uses the stable bindings provided by PyGTK. 

As it is unlikely that anybody will continue maintaining these stable bindings, applications using PyGTK should be ported to using the dynamic Python bindings provided by PyGObject (now that PyGI has been merged into PyGObject).
The feedback on migration provided by application maintainers will also help PyGObject to improve its dynamic bindings.

Please see http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PythonIntrospectionPorting for more information and guidelines.

For help there is a mailing list at http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk . For getting involved in the development of pygobject there is a mailing list at http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list . There is also the #python IRC channel on irc.gimp.net.

./emerillon-plugins/configure.ac:	pygtk-2.0 >= $PYGTK_REQUIRED],
Comment 1 Łukasz Jernaś 2010-08-07 17:45:01 UTC
Migration to libpeas is planned for emerillon, so this is also on my TODO list.
Comment 2 Johannes Schmid 2011-06-26 18:38:41 UTC
I did the migration to libpeas in the "gtk3" branch. As a proof I ported the search plugin. The other plugins still need to be done but I guess that's pretty trivial.
Comment 3 Laurent Bigonville 2011-08-31 11:17:20 UTC
This problem has been fixed in the development version. The fix will be available in the next major software release. Thank you for your bug report.