After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 610738 - Missing license.txt in anjuta-extras scintilla plugin
Missing license.txt in anjuta-extras scintilla plugin
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: anjuta
Classification: Applications
Component: plugins: editor: scintilla
2.28.x
Other All
: Low trivial
: Anjuta 2.30
Assigned To: Naba Kumar
Anjuta maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-02-22 21:21 UTC by Luca Bruno
Modified: 2010-04-19 20:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Luca Bruno 2010-02-22 21:21:02 UTC 
Hello,
in both anjuta and anjuta-extras there're many files referring to License.txt, but this file doesn't exist in the anjuta distributon. Therefore there's no way to guess what license is used for those files.
Comment 1 Johannes Schmid 2010-02-22 23:21:38 UTC 
Hmm, I saw exactly one file and that was plugins/macros/macros.xml with is generated by intltool. I don't know what intltool does there or if can be tweaked though.

Do you have any other files? Actually the correct file is called COPYING.
Comment 2 Luca Bruno 2010-02-23 08:10:22 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, I saw exactly one file and that was plugins/macros/macros.xml with is
> generated by intltool. I don't know what intltool does there or if can be
> tweaked though.
> 
> Do you have any other files? Actually the correct file is called COPYING.

They're all in anjuta-extras scintilla plugin.
Comment 3 Johannes Schmid 2010-02-28 18:59:45 UTC 
OK, we should add the Scintilla license which is some kind of bsd license to the package!
Comment 4 Sébastien Granjoux 2010-02-28 20:55:01 UTC 
It's easy to fix, I have just done it.
Comment 5 Luca Bruno 2010-04-01 13:38:44 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> It's easy to fix, I have just done it.

Apparently you've missed it in the Makefile.am, the license is not being distributed with tarballs.
Comment 6 Johannes Schmid 2010-04-19 20:36:29 UTC 
Fixed!