After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 60915 - capplets all screwed up on upgrade to 0.1.61
capplets all screwed up on upgrade to 0.1.61
Status: RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Product: gnome-pilot
Classification: Other
Component: capplet
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-pilot Maintainers
gnome-pilot Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-09-21 23:49 UTC by Raul Acevedo
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Raul Acevedo 2001-09-21 23:49:31 UTC 
I upgraded to gnome-pilot 0.1.61 via Ximian's Red Carpet, and the Control
Center got all screwed up with respect to the Pilot stuff.

First, a new top-level capplet appeared, called "*MISSINGNAME*", with a
sub-applet called "*MISSINGNAME*".  Underneath it had the Pilot Conduits
and Pilot Link capplets.

This I traced to the RPM installing a /usr/share/control-center/capplets
directory, which contained the weird capplets.  I removed the directory,
and the funky *MISSINGNAME* capplets went away.

Second, and most importantly, now when I click on Pilot Conduits (under
Peripherals), I get exactly the same capplet as Pilot Link (with the
Pilots/Devices/Advanced tabs), and I cannot find a way to get to the
capplets for the various conduits.
Comment 1 Edmund Flammer 2001-09-27 20:45:10 UTC 
I am having the *exact* same issuse with the same build and get method
Comment 2 Edmund Flammer 2001-09-27 21:18:40 UTC 
This bug is on Ximain's site (http://bugzilla.ximian.com/) as bug 
number 10476. might be worth a joint effort
Comment 3 Raul Acevedo 2001-09-27 23:52:35 UTC 
This is really a dup of Ximian bug #10476; it's just an RPM dependency
requirement issue.  Please see my comments there
(http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10476).  Thanks!