After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 572518 - Reply-to does not work
Reply-to does not work
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution-mapi
Classification: Applications
Component: Mail
0.25.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Johnny Jacob
evolution-mapi-maint
: 577613 578920 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-02-20 05:52 UTC by Johnny Jacob
Modified: 2009-04-16 09:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
cast EX to SMTP (13.76 KB, patch)
2009-03-26 10:50 UTC, Johnny Jacob 		none Details | Review
cast EX to SMTP (rebased to trunk) (13.21 KB, patch)
2009-03-26 11:04 UTC, Johnny Jacob 		committed Details | Review

Description Johnny Jacob 2009-02-20 05:52:59 UTC 
Bug description from : http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2009-February/msg00183.html

When I perform a 'reply' or 'reply to all' to a message received
through the MAPI plugin, the mail addresses in the recipient fields do
not contain the '@some.domain' extension: they only contain the name
of the person. The received message's source (Ctrl-U) itself show the
same problem: mail addresses have the form 'John Doo <John Doo>'. If
sent, the mail bounces back. This problem occurs systematically for
members of the Active Directory and _sometimes_ with outside senders.
Comment 1 phoenix49 2009-03-13 10:08:44 UTC 
I think priority should be risen, cause this issue stop users from using evolution-mapi plugin, cause reply and forward functions does not work.

Thanks!
Comment 2 Johnny Jacob 2009-03-26 10:50:52 UTC 
Created attachment 131422 [details] [review]
cast EX to SMTP
Comment 3 Johnny Jacob 2009-03-26 11:04:58 UTC 
Created attachment 131424 [details] [review]
cast EX to SMTP (rebased to trunk)
Comment 4 Johnny Jacob 2009-04-06 12:03:52 UTC 
*** Bug 577613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Berend De Schouwer 2009-04-06 12:20:29 UTC 
Patch works-for-me(tm).

(doesn't refresh cached mails, but that's probably expected.)
Comment 6 Johnny Jacob 2009-04-15 04:43:43 UTC 
*** Bug 578920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Johnny Jacob 2009-04-15 04:44:23 UTC 
Patch committed to 0.26.1
Comment 8 Johnny Jacob 2009-04-16 09:16:17 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Patch works-for-me(tm).
> 
> (doesn't refresh cached mails, but that's probably expected.)
> 

Thanks for testing. 

Closing this as fixed.