After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 568858 - evolution-sharp should change to only depend on glib-sharp
evolution-sharp should change to only depend on glib-sharp
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: evolution-sharp
Classification: Deprecated
Component: bindings
0.19.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-sharp-maint
evolution-sharp-maint
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-01-23 15:37 UTC by Peter Alfredsen
Modified: 2014-08-30 00:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Shuffle the test programs under "make check". Require only glib-sharp to build the base .dll (3.73 KB, patch)
2009-09-02 20:58 UTC, Peter Alfredsen
none Details | Review

Description Peter Alfredsen 2009-01-23 15:37:26 UTC
monodis --assemblyref /usr/lib64/mono/evolution-sharp/evolution-sharp.dll |grep Name
	Name=mscorlib
	Name=glib-sharp
	Name=System

The easiest way would be to change:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK_SHARP, gtk-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0)
AC_SUBST(GTK_SHARP_LIBS)
to
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GLIB_SHARP, glib-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0)
AC_SUBST(GLIB_SHARP_LIBS)

and do the same in evolution/Makefile.am
Comment 1 Peter Alfredsen 2009-09-02 20:58:07 UTC
Created attachment 142355 [details] [review]
Shuffle the test programs under "make check". Require only glib-sharp to build the base .dll
Comment 2 André Klapper 2014-08-30 00:08:25 UTC
evolution-sharp has not seen any code changes since May 2009:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/archive/evolution-sharp/log/

This project is not under active development anymore and got recently archived
in GNOME Git.
It is currently unlikely that there will be any further active development.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect
reality. Please feel free to reopen this bug report in the future if anyone
takes the responsibility for active development again.