After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 564720 - Brasero trivially depends on Eel
Brasero trivially depends on Eel
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: brasero
Classification: Applications
Component: general
git master
Other All
: Normal trivial
: 0.8
Assigned To: Brasero maintainer(s)
Brasero maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-12-16 11:19 UTC by A. Walton
Modified: 2009-02-07 21:17 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
kill eel (3.18 KB, patch)
2008-12-16 11:20 UTC, A. Walton 		committed Details | Review

Description A. Walton 2008-12-16 11:19:36 UTC 
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2008-December/msg00069.html

Eel is officially biting the dust, time to drop the dependency.
Comment 1 A. Walton 2008-12-16 11:20:26 UTC 
Created attachment 124784 [details] [review]
kill eel
Comment 2 André Klapper 2008-12-16 12:02:11 UTC 
Note to myself: If Brasero gets accepted for inclusion in GNOME 2.26 this report will become a blocker (set gnome-target!).
Comment 3 Luis Medinas 2008-12-16 13:18:59 UTC 
The patch is fine please commit to both svn trunk and 0.8 stable branch.

Thanks!
Comment 4 Philippe Rouquier 2008-12-17 21:06:21 UTC 
Thanks for the patch. I committed to SVN trunk only ATM but it will be backported to brasero_0_8 branch soon.  I made a couple of small changes though since there was a couple of minor typos (you used gtk_message_dialog () instead of gtk_message_dialog_new () for example).
Thanks again.

NOTE: I'll close this bug when the new patch is backported to brasero_0_8 branch.
Comment 5 A. Walton 2008-12-17 21:39:23 UTC 
Eek, not sure how I missed that before, but in my defense I wrote that patch a long time ago and hadn't looked at it since! Thanks for the quick response.
Comment 6 Philippe Rouquier 2009-02-07 21:17:57 UTC 
Thanks for the patch. I don't think we'll get another 0.8.5 release. We've got enough to do with 2.25.x ones. So let's close this bug.