After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 55767 - Getters for all setters
Getters for all setters
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: .General
1.3.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: Medium API
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
: 55379 55417 55425 55464 55466 55470 55471 55473 55752 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-06-05 16:43 UTC by Havoc Pennington
Modified: 2008-03-02 18:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 16:43:15 UTC
Decide whether all _set functions are mandated to have a corresponding
_get. If so, write a script to list all missing _get functions in
pixbuf/gdk/gtk, and then fix each one.
Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:34:03 UTC
*** Bug 55379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:34:15 UTC
*** Bug 55417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:34:29 UTC
*** Bug 55425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:34:50 UTC
*** Bug 55464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:35:03 UTC
*** Bug 55466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:35:22 UTC
*** Bug 55470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:35:33 UTC
*** Bug 55471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:35:46 UTC
*** Bug 55473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Havoc Pennington 2001-06-05 17:36:16 UTC
*** Bug 55752 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Owen Taylor 2001-06-24 15:41:06 UTC
the GTK+ part of this has been applied. I'm marking it as future,
rather than closing it because the GDK part of this hasn't
been done yet.

The GDK part is definitely a lot smaller, and I'm not even
completley sure if we want the GDK functions when they are
expensive and require getting data back from the server
(frequently the case.)

But it still needs to be thought about a bit.
Comment 11 Murray Cumming 2007-05-04 19:55:45 UTC
This bug doesn't seem to be serving a purpose anymore. I suggest we close it.
Comment 12 Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin 2008-03-02 18:18:12 UTC
Agreed, applications shouldn't need to worry so much about Gdk. 

Closing.