After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 554907 - gstreamer-0.10.21 tarball install fails if gtkdoc-rebase is not found
gstreamer-0.10.21 tarball install fails if gtkdoc-rebase is not found
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gstreamer (core)
0.10.21
Other All
: Normal normal
: NONE
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
: 557731 559955 559959 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-10-03 18:51 UTC by Pavel Zeldin
Modified: 2008-11-09 16:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Pavel Zeldin 2008-10-03 18:51:11 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Even when given --enable-gtk-doc=no to configure, the installation fails

Steps to reproduce:
run configure on a system without gtkdoc
run make
run make install


Actual results:
...
-- Installing ./html/gstreamer.devhelp
which: no gtkdoc-rebase in (/usr/bin:/bin)
make[5]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `.../gstreamer-0.10.21/docs/gst'
make[4]: *** [install-am] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `.../gstreamer-0.10.21/docs/gst'
make[3]: *** [install] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `.../gstreamer-0.10.21/docs/gst'
make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `.../gstreamer-0.10.21/docs'
make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `.../gstreamer/src/gstreamer-0.10.21/docs'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
gstreamer: make install failed


Expected results:
no error

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
Comment 1 Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 2008-10-06 08:37:15 UTC
2008-10-06  Stefan Kost  <ensonic@users.sf.net>

	* gtk-doc.mak:
	  Apply the same fix as below to gtk-doc.mak. Somehow did not end up in
	  CVS.
Comment 2 Jan Schmidt 2008-10-24 12:49:44 UTC
*** Bug 557731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Jan Schmidt 2008-11-09 12:53:58 UTC
*** Bug 559955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2008-11-09 16:20:06 UTC
*** Bug 559959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***