After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 549970 - wrong string "Determines whether to lookup in address book for sender email"
wrong string "Determines whether to lookup in address book for sender email"
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-08-30 17:34 UTC by André Klapper
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:58 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description André Klapper 2008-08-30 17:34:33 UTC 
../mail/evolution-mail.schemas.in.h:34
"Determines whether to lookup in address book for sender email"

wrong. I don't have emails in my address book, but in my inbox.
I have ADDRESSES in my address book.
Comment 1 André Klapper 2008-08-30 17:37:11 UTC 
../mail/evolution-mail.schemas.in.h:35 
Determines whether to lookup the sender email in address book. If found, it shouldn't be a spam. It looks up in the books marked for autocompletion. It can be slow, if remote address books (like LDAP) are marked for autocompletion.


"shouldn't be"? What does that mean? "a spam", singular? like in "Can you give me a money?"
We always use junk in the ENTIRE UI. And please stop using such sloppy english, at least "should not be", though that's also not perfect.
Comment 2 Matthew Barnes 2008-08-30 22:28:42 UTC 
Rephrased:

  Consult address books when testing for junk mail

  Consult autocompletion-enabled address books when testing for junk mail.
  If the sender's email address is found, do not mark the message as junk.
  Note, this operation can be slow when consulting remote address books
  such as LDAP.

Fixed in revision 36227.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2008-08-30 22:35:04 UTC 
This one was a string change (the other ones were not), but I guess you know to announce it. :-)
Comment 4 Matthew Barnes 2008-08-30 22:39:11 UTC 
Yeah, I'm batch announcing a bunch of 'em.  :)