After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 540983 - Tasque installs files on lib on x86_64 systems
Tasque installs files on lib on x86_64 systems
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Tasque
Classification: Other
Component: General
unspecified
Other Linux
: High normal
: ---
Assigned To: Sandy Armstrong
tasque-maint
: 597160 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-06-30 19:44 UTC by Luis Medinas
Modified: 2009-10-02 21:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Proposed patch to use $(libdir) (859 bytes, patch)
2008-10-25 13:34 UTC, Sandy Armstrong 		committed Details | Review
libdir patch for RtmNet.dll (795 bytes, patch)
2008-12-30 00:45 UTC, David Kaylor 		committed Details | Review

Description Luis Medinas 2008-06-30 19:44:27 UTC 
Currently Tasque installs libraries on $prefix/lib instead of using $prefix/${libdir}. This is wrong for x86_64 systems.

Please add libdir support for configure.
Comment 1 Sandy Armstrong 2008-07-02 16:58:30 UTC 
Good catch.
Comment 2 Sandy Armstrong 2008-10-25 13:34:47 UTC 
Created attachment 121339 [details] [review]
Proposed patch to use $(libdir)

I don't have a 64-bit system available to test on.  Does this patch look right?
Comment 3 Luis Medinas 2008-10-27 21:43:08 UTC 
Yes Sandy that patch looks good now it can install libs on the proper place (lib64)

Please commit. Thanks
Comment 4 Sandy Armstrong 2008-10-28 05:05:24 UTC 
Fixed in r156.
Comment 5 David Kaylor 2008-12-30 00:45:38 UTC 
Created attachment 125496 [details] [review]
libdir patch for RtmNet.dll

Version 0.1.8 is still using $prefix/lib for RtmNet.dll. This patch fixes it for me.
Comment 6 Sandy Armstrong 2008-12-30 01:06:04 UTC 
Thanks for noticing this David.  Makefile.in is generated, so that part of the patch is not needed.  Can you commit the Makefile.am change, or should I?
Comment 7 David Kaylor 2009-01-06 15:12:36 UTC 
Sorry for the late response - I thought I would be on the CC list after attaching my patch.  I am not a developer so I suspect that I would not have permission to commit the patch.  If I do, I'll be happy to commit it; otherwise, go ahead and commit it for me. Thanks.
Comment 8 Sandy Armstrong 2009-01-06 15:27:27 UTC 
You would know if you had a GNOME SVN account.  ;-)  Patch committed in r207.  Thanks David!
Comment 9 Sandy Armstrong 2009-10-02 21:25:10 UTC 
*** Bug 597160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***