After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 533427 - GObject properties not threadsafe
GObject properties not threadsafe
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gstreamer (core)
git master
Other All
: Normal normal
: NONE
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
: 542775 546022 552978 553355 553410 554065 555412 556183 558813 559198 560117 562388 568907 569107 574777 575325 578596 584412 590431 590605 603067 609014 610743 611451 624657 625065 627750 628775 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 166020
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-05-16 10:30 UTC by Sebastian Dröge (slomo)
Modified: 2010-09-08 10:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.7/2.8



Description Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2008-05-16 10:30:28 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #166020 +++

GObject properties are not threadsafe, for example things will break if a property notification for the same object instance is emitted from multiple threads at the same time.

Possible fix for this would be a new threadsafe property implementationn in GstObject.
Comment 1 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2008-07-13 14:06:10 UTC
*** Bug 542775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Kirill Kirichenko 2008-08-14 07:12:47 UTC
Is there a bug submitted for the issue against glib ?
What are the plans for possible fix in GStreamer ?
Comment 3 Philip Withnall 2008-09-20 10:32:09 UTC
*** Bug 552978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Philip Withnall 2008-09-23 05:35:26 UTC
*** Bug 553355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Philip Withnall 2008-09-23 15:40:25 UTC
*** Bug 553410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Philip Withnall 2008-09-27 16:23:46 UTC
*** Bug 554065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Philip Withnall 2008-10-07 19:02:30 UTC
*** Bug 555412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 André Klapper 2008-10-23 22:41:19 UTC
*** Bug 556183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Philip Withnall 2008-10-31 13:36:15 UTC
*** Bug 546022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Philip Withnall 2008-11-01 16:06:06 UTC
*** Bug 558813 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Philip Withnall 2008-11-03 23:34:31 UTC
*** Bug 559198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2008-11-10 09:27:55 UTC
*** Bug 560117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Philip Withnall 2008-11-26 23:08:53 UTC
*** Bug 562388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Philip Withnall 2009-01-23 21:32:10 UTC
*** Bug 568907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 palfrey 2009-01-26 11:36:10 UTC
*** Bug 569107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Philip Withnall 2009-03-10 16:45:23 UTC
*** Bug 574777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-03-14 06:36:12 UTC
*** Bug 575325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Wim Taymans 2009-03-18 18:57:35 UTC
I reopened Bug #166020 with a patch.
Comment 19 Philip Withnall 2009-04-10 12:47:24 UTC
*** Bug 578596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Philip Withnall 2009-06-01 08:17:22 UTC
*** Bug 584412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Philip Withnall 2009-08-03 12:38:00 UTC
*** Bug 590605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Wim Taymans 2009-11-28 17:02:12 UTC
*** Bug 603067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Bastien Nocera 2009-12-09 12:07:00 UTC
*** Bug 590431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Pavol Klačanský 2009-12-21 19:00:47 UTC
When will it be fixed? my sister is angry
Comment 25 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2010-02-04 20:21:43 UTC
*** Bug 609014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Bastien Nocera 2010-02-26 10:51:48 UTC
*** Bug 610743 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Jonathan Matthew 2010-03-02 10:10:13 UTC
*** Bug 611451 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Philip Withnall 2010-07-20 18:52:42 UTC
*** Bug 624657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Bastien Nocera 2010-07-22 21:05:02 UTC
*** Bug 625065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Benjamin Otte (Company) 2010-07-22 21:08:15 UTC
With the recent fixes in bug 166020, can we consider this fixed?
Comment 31 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2010-07-23 05:42:13 UTC
Yes, thanks for comitting it :)
Comment 32 Philip Withnall 2010-08-23 19:52:13 UTC
*** Bug 627750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Jonathan Matthew 2010-09-08 10:13:33 UTC
*** Bug 628775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***