After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 531947 - Gentoo Patches for esound-0.2.38
Gentoo Patches for esound-0.2.38
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: esound
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Esound Maintainers
Esound Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-05-07 13:41 UTC by Rémi Cardona
Modified: 2008-07-15 17:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Rémi Cardona 2008-05-07 13:41:58 UTC
Here are the patches that we currently apply in Gentoo (text to follow is a copy/paste of a mail I sent to the gnome-multimedia ML)

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/media-sound/esound/files/esound-0.2.32-amd64.patch
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/media-sound/esound/files/esound-0.2.36-mode_t.patch
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/media-sound/esound/files/esound-0.2.38-as-needed.patch

Those first 3 fix build issues and can be applied as is.

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/media-sound/esound/files/esound-0.2.38-doc.patch

That one fixes an autoreconf issue because "htmldir" is already defined
by recent autoconf.

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/media-sound/esound/files/esound-0.2.38-libtool-2.2.patch

And finally that one is needed because libtool-2.2 removed the implicit
checks on C++. Although esd does not use C++ directly, the arts macro
does try to build something in C++. I didn't look much further into it
but the macros could probably be simplified a bit. This patch only fixes
the aclocal error by explicitly asking for the C++ check (this is
backwards compatible with libtool 1.5 of course).

Thanks for applying those patches.
Comment 1 Rémi Cardona 2008-05-23 15:09:14 UTC
Ping?
Comment 2 Luis Medinas 2008-07-15 15:56:43 UTC
Hi Remi

Can you please split the 3 metioned issues in 3 different bugs so it could be reviewed easily ?
I'll monitor and do some review to the patches.

Thanks
Comment 3 Jeffrey Stedfast 2008-07-15 16:38:51 UTC
these have been committed and are part of 0.2.39
Comment 4 Rémi Cardona 2008-07-15 17:39:14 UTC
Thanks guys :)