After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 529929 - crash in Epiphany Web Browser:
crash in Epiphany Web Browser:
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: swfdec-gnome
Classification: Deprecated
Component: epiphany
2.21.90
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: swfdec-gnome-maint
swfdec-gnome-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-04-25 16:39 UTC by andrew
Modified: 2008-04-28 08:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description andrew 2008-04-25 16:39:45 UTC
Version: 2.20.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.1 2008-04-08 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 17:45:04 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 219959296 vsize: 219959296 resident: 116260864 share: 27619328 rss: 116260864 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1209115387 rtime: 213105 utime: 201410 stime: 11695 cutime:8 cstime: 20 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany-browser'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb5f20940 (LWP 3612)]
[New Thread 0xb09d6b90 (LWP 9891)]
[New Thread 0xb3f5ab90 (LWP 3695)]
[New Thread 0xb475bb90 (LWP 3694)]
[New Thread 0xb4f5cb90 (LWP 3693)]
[New Thread 0xb57acb90 (LWP 3686)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb5f20940 (LWP 3612))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkembedmoz.so.0d
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 <signal handler called>
  • #11 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #12 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #13 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #14 g_assertion_message
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_assertion_message_expr
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-0.5.so.5
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-0.5.so.5
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-0.5.so.5
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-0.5.so.5
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-0.5.so.5
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-gtk-0.5.so.5
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libswfdec-gtk-0.5.so.5
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (26149 sec old) ---------------------
A:2653.1 (44:13.1) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.7%                                 [A[KPosition: 34 %
A:2558.4 (42:38.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.4%                                 [A[KPosition: 32 %
A:2558.4 (42:38.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.4%                                 A:2558.4 (42:38.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.4%                                 A:2558.4 (42:38.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2463.6 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.4%                                 A:2463.7 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.4%                                 A:2463.7 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2274.1 (37:54.1) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.2%                                 [A[KPosition: 29 %
A:2179.4 (36:19.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.3%                                 [A[KPosition: 28 %
A:2179.4 (36:19.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.3%                                 A:2179.4 (36:19.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.3%                                 A:2179.4 (36:19.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2180.3 (36:20.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.7%                                 A:2180.3 (36:20.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.7%                                 A:2180.4 (36:20.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2179.4 (36:19.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.2%                                 A:2179.4 (36:19.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.2%                                 A:2179.4 (36:19.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2180.4 (36:20.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.5%                                 A:2180.4 (36:20.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.6%                                 A:2180.4 (36:20.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2463.6 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.2%                                 A:2463.6 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.2%                                 A:2463.7 (41:03.6) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2558.4 (42:38.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.1%                                 A:2558.4 (42:38.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.1%                                 A:2558.4 (42:38.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2559.4 (42:39.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.3%                                 A:2559.4 (42:39.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  0.3%                                 A:2559.4 (42:39.4) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
A:2598.3 (43:18.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  4.2%                                 A:2598.4 (43:18.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29.8)  4.2%                                 A:2598.4 (43:18.3) of 7769.8 ( 2:09:29
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-04-27 23:45:49 UTC
Crash in swfdec.
Comment 2 Benjamin Otte (Company) 2008-04-28 08:22:02 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!