After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 525357 - crash in Epiphany Web Browser: Same as usual. Increasin...
crash in Epiphany Web Browser: Same as usual. Increasin...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] BugBuddyBugs
2.24.x
Other All
: High major
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
This bug is on the auto-stacktrace-re...
: 529372 533648 534542 536465 537667 538188 538272 538819 538857 539659 540227 540495 540505 541382 542224 542258 542552 542569 543080 543086 543087 543191 543297 543351 543385 543422 543588 543618 543673 543679 543698 543699 543830 544079 544127 544214 544227 544263 545060 545221 545826 545925 545929 545973 546030 546259 546658 546713 547220 547269 547666 547861 548018 548064 548108 548293 548493 548511 548560 548562 548755 548929 548937 548957 549018 549097 549293 549473 549596 549689 550843 550963 550965 551236 551729 551907 552355 552542 552647 552710 552758 552759 553061 553423 553424 553671 554069 554515 554744 554757 554758 555950 556121 556546 557108 558125 559177 559700 565899 566539 567648 569251 573308 574325 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-31 15:34 UTC by Scott Beamer
Modified: 2009-09-11 11:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24


Attachments
Patch by Mike Hommey (1.44 KB, patch)
2008-09-29 15:44 UTC, Josselin Mouette
none Details | Review

Description Scott Beamer 2008-03-31 15:34:14 UTC
Version: 2.22.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Same as usual. Increasing text size.


Distribution: Fedora release 8.92 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.22.0 2008-03-29 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.25-0.172.rc7.git4.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Fri Mar 28 21:46:59 EDT 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10499901
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Crux

Memory status: size: 254701568 vsize: 254701568 resident: 99459072 share: 25812992 rss: 99459072 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1206975074 rtime: 74834 utime: 70494 stime: 4340 cutime:3 cstime: 16 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb7f16730 (LWP 27259)]
[New Thread 0xaea08b90 (LWP 27464)]
[New Thread 0xab0e1b90 (LWP 27462)]
[New Thread 0xb460cb90 (LWP 27266)]
[New Thread 0xb500db90 (LWP 27265)]
[New Thread 0xb5a0eb90 (LWP 27264)]
[New Thread 0xb668bb90 (LWP 27260)]
0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb7f16730 (LWP 27259))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 run_bug_buddy
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 213
  • #5 check_if_gdb
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 283
  • #6 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::InternalWriteMinidump
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 226
  • #7 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HandleException
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 197
  • #8 nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler
    at nsProfileLock.cpp line 216
  • #9 <signal handler called>
  • #10 nsRuleNode::GetStyleBackground
    at nsRuleNode.h line 215
  • #11 nsStyleContext::GetStyleBackground
    at nsStyleStructList.h line 79
  • #12 nsStyleContext::CalcStyleDifference
    at nsStyleContext.cpp line 472
  • #13 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1058
  • #14 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1125
  • #15 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #16 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #17 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #18 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #19 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #20 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #21 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #22 nsFrameManager::ReResolveStyleContext
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1404
  • #23 nsFrameManager::ComputeStyleChangeFor
    at nsFrameManager.cpp line 1470
  • #24 nsCSSFrameConstructor::RebuildAllStyleData
    at nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp line 13415


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Could not find the frame base for "_gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED".
Could not find the frame base for "gtk_widget_event_internal".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_widget_event".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_propagate_event".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_main_do_event".
Could not find the frame base for "gdk_event_dispatch".
Could not find the frame base for "nsSocketTransportService::Poll(int, unsigned int*)".
Could not find the frame base for "nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(int, int*)".
Could not find the frame base for "TimerThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsSSLThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsCertVerificationThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsThreadPool::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsHostResolver::GetHostToLookup(nsHostRecord**)".
Could not find the frame base for "nsHostResolver::GetHostToLookup(nsHostRecord**)".
Could not find the frame base for "nsCSSFrameConstructor::RebuildAllStyleData(nsChangeHint)".
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Scott Beamer 2008-03-31 15:54:38 UTC
OK, here is a better stack trace:

Distribution: Fedora release 8.92 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.22.0 2008-03-29 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.25-0.172.rc7.git4.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Fri Mar 28 21:46:59 EDT 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10499901
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Crux

Memory status: size: 168525824 vsize: 168525824 resident: 37216256 share: 22851584 rss: 37216256 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1206978566 rtime: 117 utime: 86 stime: 31 cutime:1 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb80a7730 (LWP 27867)]
[New Thread 0xb24acb90 (LWP 27878)]
[New Thread 0xb3c11b90 (LWP 27877)]
[New Thread 0xb4612b90 (LWP 27874)]
[New Thread 0xb5013b90 (LWP 27873)]
[New Thread 0xb5a14b90 (LWP 27872)]
[New Thread 0xb641cb90 (LWP 27868)]
0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Could not find the frame base for "gtk_widget_event_internal".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_widget_event".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_propagate_event".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__gtk_main_do_event".
Could not find the frame base for "gdk_event_dispatch".
Could not find the frame base for "g_main_context_iterate".
Could not find the frame base for "nsSocketTransportService::Poll(int, unsigned int*)".
Could not find the frame base for "nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(int, int*)".
Could not find the frame base for "TimerThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsSSLThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsCertVerificationThread::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsThreadPool::Run()".
Could not find the frame base for "nsHostResolver::GetHostToLookup(nsHostRecord**)".
Could not find the frame base for "nsHostResolver::GetHostToLookup(nsHostRecord**)".
Could not find the frame base for "IA__g_spawn_sync".
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-03-31 16:31:58 UTC
Definitely a problem in the Mozilla codebase. Which back-end/version are you using?

I didn't find a relevant bug on bugzilla.mozilla.org, so you may want to file one.
Comment 3 Scott Beamer 2008-03-31 16:38:19 UTC
I filed one with RedHat and referenced this (right after my previous commment).

The back-end is XULRunner 1.9
0.50.cvs20080327.fc9
Comment 4 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-04-22 12:53:43 UTC
*** Bug 529372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-05-24 21:10:18 UTC
*** Bug 534542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-03 22:49:09 UTC
*** Bug 536465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-10 22:16:43 UTC
*** Bug 537667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-14 21:23:51 UTC
*** Bug 538188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-14 21:29:55 UTC
*** Bug 538272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-17 22:44:38 UTC
*** Bug 538819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-17 22:45:45 UTC
*** Bug 538857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-26 09:25:15 UTC
*** Bug 540227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Matěj Cepl 2008-06-27 14:33:05 UTC
*** Bug 540495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-27 19:28:29 UTC
*** Bug 540505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-04 07:58:57 UTC
*** Bug 541382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-04 12:36:43 UTC
This looks like Mozilla bug 400832 (marked WORKSFORME...)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400832
Comment 17 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-05 15:33:06 UTC
*** Bug 539917 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-05 15:33:24 UTC
*** Bug 539659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Sam Morris 2008-07-05 15:47:46 UTC
Mozilla say this is not that bug...
Comment 20 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 10:14:49 UTC
*** Bug 542258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 10:15:45 UTC
@Sam, could you file a new bug at b.m.o then?
Comment 22 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 13:19:24 UTC
*** Bug 542224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-12 14:14:00 UTC
*** Bug 542569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-12 14:16:05 UTC
*** Bug 542552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Sam Morris 2008-07-12 14:50:44 UTC
Forwarded from to <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444916>. Hopefully this time I will not be accused of "making a hash of this bug tracking system".
Comment 26 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-15 13:26:07 UTC
*** Bug 543080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-15 13:26:54 UTC
*** Bug 543086 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-15 13:27:06 UTC
*** Bug 543087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-17 07:56:05 UTC
*** Bug 543191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-17 07:57:41 UTC
*** Bug 543385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-17 07:57:51 UTC
*** Bug 543297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-17 07:58:05 UTC
*** Bug 543351 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-17 13:37:13 UTC
*** Bug 543422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-18 13:20:09 UTC
*** Bug 543588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-18 21:11:25 UTC
*** Bug 543618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 36 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-19 10:16:56 UTC
*** Bug 543673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-19 10:17:44 UTC
*** Bug 543699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-19 10:18:19 UTC
*** Bug 543679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-19 10:23:42 UTC
*** Bug 543698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-20 16:29:50 UTC
*** Bug 543830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-22 07:55:31 UTC
*** Bug 544079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-22 09:37:44 UTC
*** Bug 544127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-22 21:34:49 UTC
*** Bug 544214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-22 21:37:03 UTC
*** Bug 544227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-23 09:38:57 UTC
*** Bug 544263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-28 07:56:28 UTC
*** Bug 545060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-28 20:44:16 UTC
*** Bug 545221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-01 13:49:27 UTC
*** Bug 545826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 49 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-02 17:25:34 UTC
*** Bug 545925 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 50 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-02 17:26:10 UTC
*** Bug 545929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 51 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-02 17:29:58 UTC
*** Bug 545973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 52 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-03 11:27:15 UTC
*** Bug 546030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-04 21:41:07 UTC
*** Bug 546259 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 54 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-06 20:14:29 UTC
*** Bug 546658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 55 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-07 08:21:57 UTC
*** Bug 546713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 56 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-11 00:09:26 UTC
*** Bug 547220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 57 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-11 11:32:17 UTC
*** Bug 547269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 58 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-13 22:28:51 UTC
*** Bug 547666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 59 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-17 17:27:48 UTC
*** Bug 548108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 60 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-17 17:28:58 UTC
*** Bug 548064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 61 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-17 19:47:19 UTC
*** Bug 547861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 62 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-17 19:52:09 UTC
*** Bug 548018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 63 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-19 07:56:04 UTC
*** Bug 548293 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 64 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-19 20:40:13 UTC
*** Bug 548511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 65 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-19 20:53:49 UTC
*** Bug 548493 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 66 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-20 07:23:51 UTC
*** Bug 548560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 67 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-20 07:24:16 UTC
*** Bug 548562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 68 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-20 22:29:11 UTC
*** Bug 548755 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 69 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-23 13:30:13 UTC
*** Bug 548929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 70 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-23 13:31:44 UTC
*** Bug 549018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 71 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-23 13:32:22 UTC
*** Bug 548957 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 72 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-23 13:32:56 UTC
*** Bug 548937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 73 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-23 13:33:30 UTC
*** Bug 549097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 74 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-25 12:35:28 UTC
*** Bug 549293 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 75 Rémi Cardona 2008-08-25 12:39:38 UTC
From the upstream bug :

----------

Boris Zbarsky (todo: 200+ items) [gone 8/9--8/17]   2008-07-04 10:08:27 PDT

Not really, since your stack is quite different from the one here and hence the
reason has to be different (for example, you're not in frame construction _or_
reflow).

So basically, whatever you're seeing is a different bug that needs separate
debugging.

----------

Has a new bug been opened? Thanks
Comment 76 Sam Morris 2008-08-25 16:12:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #75)
> Has a new bug been opened? Thanks

See comment #25 :)
Comment 77 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-26 19:39:11 UTC
*** Bug 549473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 78 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-28 12:06:23 UTC
*** Bug 549596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 79 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-08-28 12:08:31 UTC
*** Bug 549689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 80 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-04 14:18:00 UTC
*** Bug 550843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 81 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-05 09:14:36 UTC
*** Bug 550965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 82 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-05 09:14:37 UTC
*** Bug 550963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 83 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-07 17:16:26 UTC
*** Bug 551236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 84 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-10 21:04:56 UTC
*** Bug 551729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 85 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-12 11:56:02 UTC
*** Bug 551907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 86 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-15 14:56:31 UTC
*** Bug 552355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 87 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-17 08:01:55 UTC
*** Bug 552542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 88 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-17 15:14:28 UTC
*** Bug 552647 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 89 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-18 08:07:43 UTC
*** Bug 552710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 90 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-18 11:43:13 UTC
*** Bug 552758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 91 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-18 11:43:51 UTC
*** Bug 552759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 92 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-21 13:29:24 UTC
*** Bug 553061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 93 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-23 21:37:06 UTC
*** Bug 553424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 94 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-23 21:37:18 UTC
*** Bug 553423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 95 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-24 21:47:12 UTC
*** Bug 553671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 96 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-28 13:14:51 UTC
*** Bug 554069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 97 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-28 13:17:14 UTC
Latest comment on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444894:

"Looks like epiphany is to blame here. It appears that during the reconstruct,
gecko sends a MOZILLA_EMBED_LOAD_LOADING signal for one background image, and
epiphany's handler calls ephy_base_embed_restore_zoom_level, which ends up
doing a SetTextZoom because at the time ephy_base_embed_restore_zoom_level is
called, GetTextZoom returns the old zoom level, which means
ephy_base_embed_restore_zoom_level believes it's different from the new zoom
level in which case it fires SetTextZoom. I guess EphyBrowser should keep the
zoom level itself instead of relying on GetTextZoom..."

Reopening.
Comment 98 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-29 08:02:39 UTC
*** Bug 533648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 99 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-29 08:03:25 UTC
From bug 533648:

Comment #15 from Josselin Mouette (points: 15)
2008-09-28 17:42 UTC [reply]

According to glandium, the problem lies in epiphany. See
http://bugs.debian.org/486744 for two possible patches.
Comment 100 Josselin Mouette 2008-09-29 15:44:10 UTC
Created attachment 119595 [details] [review]
Patch by Mike Hommey

I uploaded a new version to Debian with this patch today, since it looked fine to me, and actually fixes the crash for good.
Comment 101 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-01 09:24:45 UTC
*** Bug 554515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 102 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-02 22:41:34 UTC
*** Bug 554758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 103 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-02 22:41:49 UTC
*** Bug 554757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 104 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-02 22:44:20 UTC
*** Bug 554744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 105 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-11 20:19:19 UTC
*** Bug 555950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 106 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-13 12:18:16 UTC
*** Bug 556121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 107 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-16 14:06:36 UTC
*** Bug 556546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 108 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2008-10-18 10:22:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #100)
> Created an attachment (id=119595) [edit]
> Patch by Mike Hommey
> 
> I uploaded a new version to Debian with this patch today, since it looked fine
> to me, and actually fixes the crash for good.
> 

Christian?
Comment 109 Christian Persch 2008-10-19 13:32:42 UTC
The patch doesn't seem to re-set zoom to 1.0 when the document changes?
Comment 110 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-10-20 19:36:10 UTC
*** Bug 557108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 111 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-27 16:54:57 UTC
*** Bug 558125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 112 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-11-03 23:55:00 UTC
*** Bug 559177 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 113 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-11-07 09:31:45 UTC
*** Bug 559700 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 114 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-01-04 22:38:00 UTC
*** Bug 566539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 115 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-01-06 12:56:49 UTC
*** Bug 565899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 116 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-01-14 09:43:33 UTC
*** Bug 567648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 117 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-01-27 09:24:30 UTC
*** Bug 569251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 118 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-02-26 21:03:05 UTC
*** Bug 573308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 119 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-03-06 11:33:38 UTC
*** Bug 574325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 120 Christian Persch 2009-04-10 18:23:02 UTC
Reality check.
Comment 121 Xan Lopez 2009-09-11 11:45:09 UTC
Gecko port bug, closing.