After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 523373 - background zoom should be centered
background zoom should be centered
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-desktop
Classification: Core
Component: libgnome-desktop
2.22.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Desktop Maintainers
Desktop Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-19 15:09 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2008-05-05 15:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22

Attachments
proposed fix (1.03 KB, patch)
2008-04-26 14:16 UTC, Jens Granseuer 		committed Details | Review

Description Sebastien Bacher 2008-03-19 15:09:07 UTC 
The bug has been described on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/197357

"When applying the style option "zoom" the background gets zoomed from the left top or bottom edge (don't know which one, does not matter anyways).
Generally, a picture should be zoomed from its center. (if required there, should be another option, for zooming against a user defined point)

I got around that the option *center* uses aswell the left top edge as center and not the actual center which it should."
Comment 1 Jens Granseuer 2008-03-19 17:34:57 UTC 
Not reproducible here (all 2.22.0).

Does it happen in the background, the background thumbnail, or both?

Is nautilus managing the background, or g-s-d?

Exact versions of nautilus, g-s-d, and gnome-desktop involved?
Comment 2 Sebastien Bacher 2008-04-22 16:26:18 UTC 
the background and the thumbnails are wrong, using nautilus or g-s-d to displays the image makes no difference, GNOME 2.22.1 is used
Comment 3 Sebastien Bacher 2008-04-24 12:33:05 UTC 
seems to be rather a gnome-desktop issue
Comment 4 Jens Granseuer 2008-04-26 14:16:07 UTC 
Created attachment 109952 [details] [review]
proposed fix
Comment 5 Vincent Untz 2008-05-05 15:07:24 UTC 
This problem has been fixed in the development version. The fix will be available in the next major software release. Thank you for your bug report.