After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 506366 - gnumeric 1.8 Cygwin fixes
gnumeric 1.8 Cygwin fixes
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: General
1.8.x
Other Cygwin
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-30 04:13 UTC by Yaakov Selkowitz
Modified: 2008-03-09 17:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
1.8.0 cygwin patch (5.72 KB, patch)
2007-12-30 04:15 UTC, Yaakov Selkowitz
none Details | Review
1.8.1 Cygwin patch (7.97 KB, patch)
2008-01-25 16:56 UTC, Yaakov Selkowitz
none Details | Review
1.8.1 Cygwin patch (7.27 KB, patch)
2008-01-27 02:02 UTC, Yaakov Selkowitz
committed Details | Review

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2007-12-30 04:13:19 UTC
I'm attaching a patch which fixes the differences and similarities between Cygwin and MinGW as has already been done with goffice.

Also, doc/*/gnumeric-*.omf and tools/dumpdef.pl were not in the 1.8.0 tarball.
Comment 1 Yaakov Selkowitz 2007-12-30 04:15:01 UTC
Created attachment 101835 [details] [review]
1.8.0 cygwin patch

* configure.in:
* schemas/Makefile.am:
* src/Makefile.am: Differentiate between Cygwin and native Windows; fixes bug 506366.
Comment 2 Yaakov Selkowitz 2008-01-25 16:56:52 UTC
Created attachment 103736 [details] [review]
1.8.1 Cygwin patch

Updated patch for 1.8.1: the OMF file is now in tarball, but dumpdef.pl is still missing.
Comment 3 Morten Welinder 2008-01-26 23:14:26 UTC
Jody: does this collide with your win32 stuff?
Comment 4 Yaakov Selkowitz 2008-01-27 02:02:00 UTC
Created attachment 103798 [details] [review]
1.8.1 Cygwin patch

Removed perl-related chunks that shouldn't have been part of the patch, as they shouldn't be necessary with perl 5.10.
Comment 5 Yaakov Selkowitz 2008-03-09 17:29:49 UTC
This got into trunk, but any chance that it could go into gnumeric-1-8 branch as well?