After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 497626 - opml export file really could use a DOCTYPE Declaration
opml export file really could use a DOCTYPE Declaration
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: straw
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
HEAD
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: 0.28
Assigned To: Maintainers of straw
Maintainers of straw
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-11-17 11:52 UTC by Kumar Appaiah
Modified: 2008-01-06 21:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Kumar Appaiah 2007-11-17 11:52:52 UTC 
From the Debian bug #226120:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226120

It's come to my attention that the opml file which straw exports doesn't
have a DOCTYPE Declaration header item. While this apparently is not
(yet) required in XML, I believe it is more than desirable to have.

mlview, FI, will complain about the lack of it.

Filed by: Jim W. Jaszewski

Other information:
Comment 1 Paweł Paprota 2008-01-06 13:14:31 UTC 
The only DTD I've found for OPML that could be applicable here is mentioned in the following blog post:

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/04/15/investigating_opml

So it would look like this:

<!DOCTYPE opml PUBLIC "-//Userland//DTD OPML XML V1.0//EN" "http://static.userland.com/gems/radiodiscuss/opmlDtd.txt">