After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 492131 - With HighContrastInverse GTK theme, links are blue-on-blue
With HighContrastInverse GTK theme, links are blue-on-blue
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 484150
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Backend:Mozilla
2.20.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-31 18:45 UTC by Josselin Mouette
Modified: 2007-10-31 23:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description Josselin Mouette 2007-10-31 18:45:57 UTC
[ forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/444974 by Trent W. Buck ]

Using the Gecko backend, webpages inherit a default background and
foreground from GTK.  However, the anchor and visited anchor colours
(blue and purple by default, respectively) do not!

This means that any GTK theme with a dark background will result in
very hard to read links unless the user understands CSS well enough to
write a user CSS stylesheet by hand(!) to prevent this.

This is most obvious with the HighContrastInverse GTK theme, which
results in blue-on-navyblue text -- very hard to read, even for people
who have normal vision.

I notice that the HighContrastInverse theme sets the following
properties

    GtkWidget::link-color = "#FFFFFF"
    GtkWidget::visited-link-color = "#FFCCFF"

Epiphany should either use these as the default link colours, or not
use the GTK theme for the default foreground / background colours.

PS: this does not appear to affect epiphany-webkit, which seems to
ignore GTK themes entirely.
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-10-31 22:33:49 UTC
Is this a dupe of bug 484150?
Comment 2 Josselin Mouette 2007-10-31 23:01:10 UTC
It seems so, sorry for missing it.
Comment 3 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-10-31 23:11:15 UTC
Thanks.



*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484150 ***