After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 47169 - Latin-1 characters don't display correctly on a typical Japanese environment
Latin-1 characters don't display correctly on a typical Japanese environment
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.1.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: 2.2.x
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on: 47170
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-02-28 21:18 UTC by Darin Adler
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.1/2.2



Description Darin Adler 2001-09-10 01:03:32 UTC
This is the underlying problem from bug 47138. See that bug for details.

The key is that the Japanese fonts don't have glyphs for the non-ASCII Latin-1
characters.



------- Additional Comments From darin@bentspoon.com 2001-02-28 16:20:52 ----

One idea is to fall back either to other characters or other fonts.



------- Additional Comments From ramiro@fateware.com 2001-03-12 02:59:50 ----

I think its a good idea to use alternate characters or fonts.

For alternate characters, we could replace an 'é' with an 'e'.

We could build such a table of replacement characters from 'man iso_8859_1'

Im not sure how the alternate font approach would work.  I know that Mozilla
does a better job of character replacement thant Netscape 4.x.  That is why in
4.x you see so many '?'s.  Maybe we could look in Mozilla for ideas ? 



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 21:03 -------
Bug depends on bug(s) 47170.
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-01-05 04:12:06 UTC
Changing to "old" target milestone for all bugs laying around with no milestone set.
Comment 2 Ramiro Estrugo 2002-04-22 23:45:21 UTC
Reassigning bugs from myself to nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 3 Aschwin van der Woude 2002-11-14 22:05:36 UTC
I wonder if this is still an issue now we have fontconfig/pango??
Comment 4 Murray Cumming 2003-07-28 13:45:47 UTC
We should close this if nobody says that it's still a problem.
Comment 5 Kjartan Maraas 2003-10-27 23:41:34 UTC
Doing that.