After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 46947 - add queuing of outgoing calls as well as incoming calls in NautilusView (remove from Mozilla)
add queuing of outgoing calls as well as incoming calls in NautilusView (remo...
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Extension Library
2.1.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: future
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 46949 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-02-23 20:01 UTC by Darin Adler
Modified: 2006-07-04 09:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Darin Adler 2001-09-10 01:13:40 UTC 
It turns out that our "defer until idle time" approach for CORBA is needed just
as much for outgoing oneway CORBA calls as for incoming ones. Mike Fleming
discovered this the hard way and implemented a solution in the Mozilla
component.

But a solution in the NautilusView could be better in a number of ways:

    1) would help all components, not just Mozilla
    2) could share the existing idle queue code
    3) would allow queuing multiple calls
    4) would preserve the sequence of calls

It's not required for 1.0, I guess, but I wish we had done it this way in the
first place.



------- Additional Comments From darin@bentspoon.com 2001-02-23 15:48:24 ----

*** Bug 46949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 21:13 -------
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-01-05 04:19:17 UTC 
Changing to "old" target milestone for all bugs laying around with no milestone set.
Comment 2 Sebastien Bacher 2005-05-15 12:36:01 UTC 
is that still an issue?
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-07-04 09:47:20 UTC 
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information Sebastien asked for.
Thanks!