After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 439080 - Calculator doesn't let me punch in "^" manually without using x^2 button.
Calculator doesn't let me punch in "^" manually without using x^2 button.
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Product: gnome-calculator
Classification: Core
Component: general
5.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Rich Burridge
Rich Burridge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-05-17 09:39 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2007-05-18 14:42 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description Sebastien Bacher 2007-05-17 09:39:41 UTC
The bug has been opened on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalctool/+bug/110029

"Binary package hint: gcalctool

When I punch the key "^" Calculator does not do anything. Instead I must use the "x^2" button to get the "^" to appear in my Calculator screen. It seems to me like this should work because bug 16505 was supposed to have changed the key to "^" in the first place.
..."
Comment 1 Rich Burridge 2007-05-17 13:50:38 UTC
Before I close this out as NOTABUG, could I get an example where
this is failing? I tried the following (typing via the keyboard):

7
^
8
=

I got the result:

5764801

This is with gcalctool v5.19.2 on Ubuntu Feisty.
Comment 2 Rich Burridge 2007-05-17 13:54:14 UTC
Ahh, I reread the original bug. Yes, the "^" key will only
work in scientific mode because that's where the x^y button
resides.

The key equivalent of x squared is "@". If you hover the mouse
over the button you'll see this information.

In gcalctool Basic mode, I used the keyboard to enter

4
@
=

I got the result of 16.

NOTABUG.
 
Comment 3 Jacob 2007-05-17 15:41:41 UTC
I must disagree, then, to why I cannot add a "^" in Advanced mode. It seems silly that a user must delete the 2 from the ^2 (squared) to be able to cube a number, etc.

Shouldn't this at least be added as a feature request instead of rejecting it?
Comment 4 Rich Burridge 2007-05-17 15:54:07 UTC
Let's turn this around. Why can't you just run the calculator in
Scientific mode? That has the x^y button.

I don't see the point of making it a feature request because it was
a deliberate design decision that only the buttons should in each
of the modes, were available in that mode.
 
Comment 5 Jacob 2007-05-18 00:54:09 UTC
Quote:
"I don't see the point of making it a feature request because it was
a deliberate design decision that only the buttons should in each
of the modes, were available in that mode."

Well, I'll agree to dropping this only if there's a good reason for not including this in Advanced mode.

My reason is for ease-of-use: I don't want to be searching for things in a GUI crowded with twice as many features as I really need.
Comment 6 Rich Burridge 2007-05-18 01:52:46 UTC
" My reason is for ease-of-use: I don't want to be searching for things 
  in a GUI crowded with twice as many features as I really need."

Sorry, I don't understand. If you've learnt the keyboard shortcut for
this operation, why do you need to search for it after the first time?

I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

But you know, gcalctool is open source.
You can find the latest source tarball distributions at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gcalctool/5.19/

I suggest you modify it for your own needs.
Comment 7 Jacob 2007-05-18 14:42:09 UTC
"I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one." - I think you are right.

Case closed. :)