After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 412804 - python plugin: Incorrect Function Description
python plugin: Incorrect Function Description
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: General
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
: 400013 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-02-27 21:58 UTC by Nils Kanning
Modified: 2007-09-10 08:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
changed function_get_gnumeric_help (26.75 KB, text/plain)
2007-02-27 22:07 UTC, Nils Kanning 		  Details
same as above, but now as diff (1.61 KB, patch)
2007-02-28 08:24 UTC, Nils Kanning 		committed Details | Review

Description Nils Kanning 2007-02-27 21:58:43 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
The descriptions of python functions do not show up correctly in the
"Function Selector" (Insert/Function). Only "Incorrect Function Description." is
displayed. I tested this with Gnumeric 1.6.3 but according to the definition of python_function_get_gnumeric_help in /plugins/python-loader/python-loader.c
this behaviour should also occur in the svn-version.


Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Nils Kanning 2007-02-27 22:07:22 UTC 
Created attachment 83495 [details]
changed function_get_gnumeric_help

I changed function_get_gnumeric_help in order to work with the new GnmFuncHelp struct. I only tested this with the source of 1.6.3 but i think it should also work with more recent versions.
Maybe someone can look it over to see if it really does the right thing ...
Comment 2 Nils Kanning 2007-02-28 08:24:10 UTC 
Created attachment 83526 [details] [review]
same as above, but now as diff
Comment 3 Jody Goldberg 2007-07-19 00:04:10 UTC 
Comment on attachment 83526 [details] [review]
same as above, but now as diff

I put in a similar patch for 1.7.11.  Thank you.
Comment 4 Jon Kåre Hellan 2007-09-10 08:20:33 UTC 
*** Bug 400013 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***