After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 405201 - User cannot select multiple beagle-search tiles for click and drag.
User cannot select multiple beagle-search tiles for click and drag.
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: beagle
Classification: Other
Component: General
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Beagle Bugs
Beagle Bugs
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-02-07 01:37 UTC by Kevin Kubasik
Modified: 2018-07-03 09:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Kevin Kubasik 2007-02-07 01:37:38 UTC
This is a forwarded bug from the Ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/beagle/+bug/80945
Comment 1 Pavel Šefránek 2008-02-17 14:11:34 UTC
I can make a search in beagle, and then, for example, drag files to nautilus-cd-burner and create a cd out of them. This is comfortable, however I have to drag files one at a time. Almost every program showing a list of items allows multiple selection by dragging the mouse and/or by ctrl+clicking and shift+clicking, and all the other shortcuts you know. Beagle, in my opinion, should make no exception to this rule :)
Comment 2 Pavel Šefránek 2008-02-17 14:12:20 UTC
comment 1 is only a paste from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/beagle/+bug/80945
Comment 3 André Klapper 2018-07-03 09:54:03 UTC
Beagle is not under active development anymore and had its last code changes in early 2011. Its codebase has been archived (see bug 796735):
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/beagle/commits/master

"tracker" is an available alternative.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect
reality. Please feel free to reopen this ticket (or rather transfer the project
to GNOME Gitlab, as GNOME Bugzilla is deprecated) if anyone takes the
responsibility for active development again.