After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 40289 - Clicking on a tar/bzip/gzip file doesn't show contents
Clicking on a tar/bzip/gzip file doesn't show contents
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Extension Library
2.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: future
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 41378 41383 41384 41608 42221 42813 43133 43777 62954 153969 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2000-03-10 17:38 UTC by Darin Adler
Modified: 2008-05-03 10:33 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Darin Adler 2001-09-10 00:39:43 UTC
"Carbamide" says that it used to open as a directory instead and it's broken 
now



------- Additional Comments From mjs@noisehavoc.org 2000-03-27 10:36:32 ----

It never used to open as a directory AFAIK (but it should).




------- Additional Comments From mjs@noisehavoc.org 2000-05-02 01:54:05 ----

It doesn't show it as text, it only shows it as the sample view, but it doesn't
give a directory view either.




------- Additional Comments From mjs@noisehavoc.org 2000-06-15 13:21:05 ----

Reducing this task to just:

When you click on a tar file in nautilus, it should automatically
open the right URI to point to it's directory contents, and be able to
apply file manager views to it. However, we must make sure the current
RPM view is still available for RPMs.

The remainder of the work is now in the following bugs:

1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384




------- Additional Comments From mjs@noisehavoc.org 2000-06-20 15:42:11 ----

Moving to post-1.0, per Bud and Andy's request.




------- Additional Comments From sullivan@eazel.com 2000-07-31 11:50:22 ----

After talking to pepper, we're re-deferring these gzip bugs. There's just too
much work on Ian's plate (and everyone else's) to try to get them done in time
for our deadlines. I left bug 41174 un-deferred for now because it's a slightly
different topic and I don't understand the trade-offs well.



------- Additional Comments From eli@eazel.com 2000-10-16 19:30:36 ----

Batch-assigning QA ownership of remaining bugs to eli@eazel.com



------- Additional Comments From yakk@yakk.net 2000-12-20 17:03:19 ----

Moving to my new Bugzilla account



------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 20:39 -------
Bug depends on bug(s) 41377 41378.
Bug blocks bug(s) 41383.
Comment 1 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:29:23 UTC
*** Bug 41383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:29:48 UTC
*** Bug 41384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:31:20 UTC
*** Bug 41378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:34:42 UTC
*** Bug 41608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:36:41 UTC
Some comments by yakk from bug 41608 that should be considered in the
implementation. I agree view as should not be used. I like the chain
url idea though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Compressed files and archives can be decoded by choosing `View as
gzip' or `View
as zip' from the `View as' menu now.

This uses gnome-vfs modules, so a path of /home/yakk/file.txt.gz will
be changed
to /home/yakk/file.txt.gz#gzip:. I don't really like something in the
View as
menu changing the currently viewed URI, but I can't think of a better
way of
doing it.

Are there any better ideas?
Comment 6 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:39:24 UTC
*** Bug 42221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:40:23 UTC
*** Bug 42813 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:41:06 UTC
*** Bug 43133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:41:47 UTC
bug 43133, has some debug info that may or may not be useful, dont know.
Comment 10 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:42:28 UTC
*** Bug 43777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-03-31 22:43:39 UTC
louie: I've set this bug as a place holder for all tar/gzip/bzip bugs.
I think I got most of them.
Comment 12 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-04-05 07:00:39 UTC
*** Bug 62954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Aschwin van der Woude 2002-11-17 00:18:23 UTC
Although file-roller is reasonable temporary solution, it would be
nice to have a component handling it.
Comment 14 Glynn Foster 2003-04-23 14:55:33 UTC
file-roller is now part of the desktop release. Is there really
anything to gain by having a component for this?
Comment 15 Matthias Warkus 2003-09-12 14:22:11 UTC
Yes. One of *the* chief arguments of the "Nautilus sucks" squad would
go away. Of course I don't suggest we implement everything that's in
Konqueror, but people are pointing out all the time that it has done
archive browsing for years and Nautilus doesn't.
Besides, transparent decompression would really be nice to have.
Browsing an archive is just like browsing a file system, I don't see
why it has to happen in an external program. File Roller has nothing
but a list view; it would be nice to have the icon view and a tree
when looking around in a large archive.
Comment 16 Erika Ahlswede 2004-07-27 08:59:30 UTC
This is a very old bug, but it should probably be looked at-- the capability
seems to be there, at least in the extfs module of VFS. File roller doesn't obey
stuff like single/double click settings, and isn't spacial when Nautilus is in
spacial mode-- in short, it's not a very good file manager. :)
Comment 17 Vincent Noel 2004-09-28 18:42:56 UTC
*** Bug 153969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Raphael Bosshard 2006-03-05 19:11:47 UTC
Is there anything going on concerning this bug? I still think that Nautilus should be able to open compressed folders. Iso-files also.
Comment 19 Johan Walles 2006-05-14 06:37:45 UTC
Shouldn't this bug really be in GNOME-VFS?  Or does GNOME-VFS already support reading archive contents?

It seems to me that if this functionality was in GNOME-VFS, then *all* apps would suddenly be able to read suff from archives.  That would be better than just Nautilus being able to.
Comment 20 A. Walton 2008-05-03 10:33:11 UTC
We support this through GVFS now with Benjamin Otte's archive backend. Closing as fixed.