After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 393712 - Move the 'find text' dialog out of the way if the matched text is obscured by the dialog
Move the 'find text' dialog out of the way if the matched text is obscured by...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: nemiver
Classification: Other
Component: general
trunk
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nemiver maintainers
Nemiver maintainers
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-06 23:20 UTC by Jonathon Jongsma
Modified: 2020-03-10 11:56 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Jonathon Jongsma 2007-01-06 23:20:13 UTC 
If you're searching for some text that's directly under the search dialog, it might be nice to move the dialog slightly so that the user can tell that something was highlighted and found.
Comment 1 Lupine 2008-05-21 14:33:41 UTC 
I was just about to submit this exact same enhancement request.  Thankfully I searched before submitting ;-)

This type of behavior can be found in WordPad within that "other OS", and would be a great addition to Gedit.
Comment 2 Jonathon Jongsma 2008-05-21 14:58:52 UTC 
I don't know if you noticed, but this bug was filed against the Nemiver debugger, not gedit.  if you want gedit to implement the same thing, I'm afraid you'll need to open a new bug for that project :)
Comment 3 Lupine 2008-05-21 15:01:59 UTC 
yeah, thanks....I saw that right after I hit save changes....guess I should have tweaked my search results a little more.

But hey, hopefully if they implement it in one, they'll get it in the other :-)
Comment 4 André Klapper 2020-03-10 11:56:43 UTC 
Closing all open Nemiver tasks as this project does not seem to be maintained anymore. Please see https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/235#note_732192 for further information. Thanks!