After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 366250 - Source tarball contains files that are not DFSG compatible
Source tarball contains files that are not DFSG compatible
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
2.8.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-28 12:39 UTC by Øystein Gisnås
Modified: 2013-07-23 14:30 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Attachments
Removes docs/ietf directory (710.97 KB, patch)
2007-05-10 17:30 UTC, Øystein Gisnås
reviewed Details | Review
Patch to remove nonfree documents from tarball, but leave in svn (935 bytes, patch)
2008-05-04 21:18 UTC, Øystein Gisnås
committed Details | Review

Description Øystein Gisnås 2006-10-28 12:39:25 UTC
docs/ietf/*.txt in the tarball are not compatible with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. As a consequence, the pristine sources cannot be used as a basis for the evolution-exchange package in Debian.

The documents in docs/ietf are outdated and can easily be found online. I recommend removing the docs/ietf directory alltogether, maybe leaving a note in docs/ietf with online references to the documents.
Comment 1 Øystein Gisnås 2007-05-10 17:30:49 UTC
Created attachment 87974 [details] [review]
Removes docs/ietf directory

Please consider this patch for inclusion as soon as possible.
Comment 2 Srinivasa Ragavan 2007-08-21 08:47:58 UTC
I haven't heard back from Varadhan on this. On the worst, can you make a patch to just not pack it part of tar ball but leave it around the svn?

Im fine for that definitely and I can move ahead meanwhile.
Comment 3 Heikki Henriksen 2008-03-12 09:30:46 UTC
poke :)

could anyone look at this removal one day?

I don't see any reason for leaving them around in svn either, as Øystein mentioned they are both outdated and available elsewhere :)
Comment 4 Øystein Gisnås 2008-05-04 21:18:39 UTC
Created attachment 110377 [details] [review]
Patch to remove nonfree documents from tarball, but leave in svn
Comment 5 Øystein Gisnås 2008-05-04 21:19:51 UTC
I've created a new patch that leaves the documents in svn. Please apply as soon as possible - this patch has been long awaited by Debian.
Comment 6 Srinivasa Ragavan 2008-05-05 05:24:06 UTC
Commit it. I dont want to delay more than this
Comment 7 Suman Manjunath 2008-05-23 10:14:13 UTC
Patch committed to SVN trunk as r1664
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-exchange?view=revision&revision=1664

CC'ing the exchange folks who need to take a decision if we need the docs to remain in SVN.
Comment 8 Akhil Laddha 2009-07-27 12:20:10 UTC
@ abharath, any update on this bug ? 
Comment 9 André Klapper 2012-09-20 14:50:20 UTC
The "evolution-exchange" package only supports Exchange 2000 and 2003 servers. Newer versions such as Exchange 2007 and 2010 are not supported by "evolution-exchange". It is required to use the package "evolution-ews" (or to some extend "evolution-mapi") for newer version fo Exchange servers.

If the problem/request described in this report still happens with a recent version of "evolution-ews" or "evolution-mapi", please add a comment to this report (and update the "product" setting accordingly if possible).

There are currently no plans to continue the development of the package "evolution-exchange", so this report will soon be closed as WONTFIX.
Thanks for your understanding and sorry that the reported problem was not solved in time in the package "evolution-exchange".
Comment 10 André Klapper 2013-07-23 14:30:31 UTC
evolution-exchange only supports the older Microsoft Exchange server versions 2000 and 2003. The last stable release of evolution-exchange was 3.4.4 which took place a year ago.

evolution-exchange is now deprecated and not under active development anymore.

It is unlikely that there will be any further active development.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping.

Please feel free to reopen this bug report in the future if anyone takes the responsibility for active development again.

Also feel free to reopen this ticket and change the "Product" field accordingly if the reported issue still happens with a recent version (newer than version 3.6) of one of those Exchange backends that are still supported.
Please see https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/3.8/exchange-connectors-overview.html for more information on available backends.