Bug 365646 – crash in Terminal: I tried to launch Termin...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 365646 - crash in Terminal: I tried to launch Termin...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: I tried to launch Termin...


Status:	RESOLVED NOTGNOME

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	381105 381706 384220 384334 384725 390961 401445 401447 415049 429553 466919 479692 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-27 08:55 UTC by panoskoutsias
Modified:	2007-09-24 16:09 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description panoskoutsias 2006-10-27 08:55:47 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I tried to launch Terminal but never started


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 111779840 vsize: 111779840 resident: 9031680 share: 7143424 rss: 9031680 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1161939297 rtime: 7 utime: 5 stime: 2 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47393225635472 (LWP 5449)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b1a9435eeb5 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 78732

Thread 1 (Thread 47393225635472 (LWP 5449))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 _dl_rtld_di_serinfo
from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#4 _dl_make_stack_executable
from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#5 _dl_rtld_di_serinfo
from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#6 _dl_make_stack_executable
from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#7 _dl_mcount_wrapper
from /lib/libc.so.6
#8 _dl_rtld_di_serinfo
from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
#9 __libc_dlopen_mode
from /lib/libc.so.6
#10 __gconv_get_cache
from /lib/libc.so.6
#11 __gconv_get_cache
from /lib/libc.so.6
#12 __gconv_get_cache
from /lib/libc.so.6
#13 __gconv_get_alias_db
from /lib/libc.so.6
#14 iconv_close
from /lib/libc.so.6
#15 iconv_open
from /lib/libc.so.6
#16 g_iconv
from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 g_iconv_open
from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 g_convert_with_iconv
from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#19 g_convert
from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
#21 ??
#22 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#23 ??
#24 ??
#25 ??
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2006-12-04 23:31:54 UTC

*** Bug 381105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2006-12-04 23:32:13 UTC

*** Bug 381706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2006-12-10 00:48:48 UTC

*** Bug 384220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Damien Durand 2006-12-10 12:12:43 UTC

*** Bug 384334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-12 05:08:02 UTC

*** Bug 384725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Susana 2006-12-30 15:32:12 UTC

*** Bug 390961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2007-01-19 23:05:40 UTC

This is some problem with Ubuntu's iconv...

However, this application does not track its bugs in the GNOME Bugzilla. We kindly ask you to report the bug to the application authors. For a selective list of other bug tracking systems please consult http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/NonGnome.

If the affected third party application has a bug tracking system you should investigate whether a bug for the reported issue is already filed in this system. If it has not been filed yet please do so. Also ensure that both bug reports contain a link to each other.
Thanks in advance!

Comment 8 Christian Kirbach 2007-01-27 21:22:54 UTC

*** Bug 401447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Christian Kirbach 2007-01-27 21:23:03 UTC

*** Bug 401445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-06 00:27:44 UTC

*** Bug 415049 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 palfrey 2007-04-26 17:37:17 UTC

*** Bug 429553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Philip Withnall 2007-08-15 16:22:03 UTC

*** Bug 466919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 palfrey 2007-09-24 16:09:41 UTC

*** Bug 479692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***